The Feasibility of Personal Digital Assistants (PDAs) to Collect Dietary Intake Data in Low-income Pregnant Women

被引:14
作者
Fowles, Eileen R. [1 ]
Gentry, Breine [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Sch Nursing, Austin, TX 78701 USA
[2] Order St Francis St Francis Med Ctr, Peoria, IL USA
关键词
pregnancy; hand-held computers; dietary records; dietary assessment;
D O I
10.1016/j.jneb.2007.08.015
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Objectives: To determine the feasibility of using personal digital assistant (PDA)-based technology for tracking and analysis of food intake in low-income pregnant women. Design: Descriptive. Participants provided an initial 24-hour dietary recall and recorded their food intake using a PDA-based software program for 2 days. Setting: Recruitment occurred during the prenatal intake visit at a health department-sponsored Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) clinic. Participants: Nonprobability sampling was used to recruit 10 women. Variable Measured: Demographics and a satisfaction rating scale for the 2 food recording methods. A Healthy Eating Index (HEI) was calculated for each food record. Analysis: Scores of the satisfaction rating scales were summarized. Paired t tests were used to analyze differences in HEIs obtained from the participants' 24-hour recall and PDA-based food records. Results: The PDA was significantly easier to use compared to the 24-hour recall, and no significant differences in ease of remembering food intake between these methods was noted. Most women liked the PDA and felt it was more accurate than 24-hour recalls. Results showed no significant difference in mean HEI scores between food records from 24-hour recall to PDA. Conclusions and Implications: PDA-based software may be an acceptable method for obtaining food records to provide more accurate assessments of dietary intake in this vulnerable population.
引用
收藏
页码:374 / 377
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Web-based and mailed questionnaires:: A comparison of response rates and compliance [J].
Bälter, KA ;
Bälter, O ;
Fondell, E ;
Lagerros, YT .
EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 16 (04) :577-579
[2]   Accuracy of a PDA-based dietary assessment program [J].
Beasley, J ;
Riley, WT ;
Jean-Mary, J .
NUTRITION, 2005, 21 (06) :672-677
[3]   Selection of methodology to assess food intake [J].
Biró, G ;
Hulshof, KFAM ;
Ovesen, L ;
Cruz, JA .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2002, 56 (Suppl 2) :S25-S32
[4]   Self-monitoring dietary intake: Current and future practices [J].
Burke, LE ;
Warziski, M ;
Starrett, T ;
Choo, J ;
Music, E ;
Sereika, S ;
Stark, S ;
Sevick, MA .
JOURNAL OF RENAL NUTRITION, 2005, 15 (03) :281-290
[5]   Monitoring dietary change in a low-fat diet intervention study: Advantages of using 24-hour dietary recalls vs food records [J].
Buzzard, IM ;
Faucett, CL ;
Jeffery, RW ;
McBane, L ;
McGovern, P ;
Baxter, JS ;
Shapiro, AC ;
Blackburn, GL ;
Chlebowski, RT ;
Elashoff, RM ;
Wynder, EL .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DIETETIC ASSOCIATION, 1996, 96 (06) :574-579
[6]   Effectiveness of the US Department of Agriculture 5-step multiple-pass method in assessing food intake in obese and nonobese women [J].
Conway, JM ;
Ingwersen, LA ;
Vinyard, BT ;
Moshfegh, AJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2003, 77 (05) :1171-1178
[7]  
EMMONS L, 1973, J AM DIET ASSOC, V62, P409
[8]   Improving dietary self-monitoring and adherence with hand-held computers: A pilot study [J].
Glanz, K ;
Murphy, S ;
Moylan, J ;
Evensen, D ;
Curb, JD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION, 2006, 20 (03) :165-170
[9]  
Hess M.A., 1997, PORTION PHOTOS POPUL
[10]   Dietary intake - How do we measure what people are really eating? [J].
Johnson, RK .
OBESITY RESEARCH, 2002, 10 :63S-68S