Response of piping system with semi-active variable stiffness damper under tri-directional seismic excitation

被引:9
作者
Kumar, Praveen [1 ,2 ]
Jangid, R. S. [1 ]
Reddy, G. R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Bombay 400076, Maharashtra, India
[2] Bhabha Atom Res Ctr, Bombay 400085, Maharashtra, India
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
ISOLATED BUILDINGS;
D O I
10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.01.025
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
Seismic loads on piping system due to earthquakes can cause excessive vibrations, which can lead to serious instability resulting in damage or complete failure. In this paper, semi-active variable stiffness dampers (SAVSDs) have been studied to mitigate seismic response and vibration control of piping system used in the process industries, fossil and fissile fuel power plant. The SAVSD changes its stiffness depending upon the piping response and accordingly adds the control forces in the piping system. A study is conducted on the performance of SAVSD due to variation in device stiffness ratios in the switching control law and modified switching control law, which plays an important role in the present control algorithm of the damper. The effectiveness of the SAVSD in terms of reduction in the responses, namely, displacements, accelerations and base shear of the piping system is investigated by comparing uncontrolled responses under four different artificial earthquake motions with increasing amplitudes. The analytical results demonstrate that the SAVSDs under particular optimum parameters are very effective and practically implementable for the seismic response mitigation, vibration control and seismic requalification of piping systems. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:130 / 143
页数:14
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Applications of some semiactive control systems to benchmark cable-stayed bridge [J].
Agrawal, AK ;
Yang, JN ;
He, WL .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2003, 129 (07) :884-894
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, DYNAMICS STRUCTURES
[3]   Study of a semi-active stiffness damper under various earthquake inputs [J].
Djajakesukma, SL ;
Samali, B ;
Nguyen, H .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2002, 31 (10) :1757-1776
[4]  
He W.L., 2001, J BRIDGE ENG, V6, P376
[5]   Structural control: Past, present, and future [J].
Housner, GW ;
Bergman, LA ;
Caughey, TK ;
Chassiakos, AG ;
Claus, RO ;
Masri, SF ;
Skelton, RE ;
Soong, TT ;
Spencer, BF ;
Yao, JTP .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 1997, 123 (09) :897-971
[6]   SEISMIC RESPONSE CONTROLLED STRUCTURE WITH ACTIVE VARIABLE STIFFNESS SYSTEM [J].
KOBORI, T ;
TAKAHASHI, M ;
NASU, T ;
NIWA, N ;
OGASAWARA, K .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 1993, 22 (11) :925-941
[7]   Semi-active stiffness dampers for seismic control of structures [J].
Kori, Jagadish G. ;
Jangid, R. S. .
ADVANCES IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2007, 10 (05) :501-524
[8]   Experimental study of N 2 dilution on bluff-body stabilized LPG jet diffusion flame [J].
Kumar P. ;
Mishra D.P. .
Combustion, Explosion, and Shock Waves, 2009, 45 (1) :1-7
[9]   Seismic response control of smart sliding isolated buildings using variable stiffness systems: An experimental and numerical study [J].
Nagarajaiah, S ;
Sahasrabudhe, S .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2006, 35 (02) :177-197
[10]   Short time Fourier transform algorithm for wind response control of buildings with variable stiffness TMD [J].
Nagarajaiah, S ;
Varadarajan, N .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2005, 27 (03) :431-441