Inconsistencies Between Medical Records and Patient-Reported Recommendations for Follow-Up After Abnormal Pap Tests

被引:6
作者
Slone, Stacey [1 ]
White, Carol [1 ]
Shelton, Brent [1 ]
Van Meter, Emily [1 ]
DeSimone, Christopher [1 ]
Schoenberg, Nancy [1 ]
Dignan, Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kentucky, Lexington, KY USA
关键词
CERVICAL-CANCER; CARE; ADHERENCE; WOMEN; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1089/jwh.2011.3414
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Purpose: Adherence with recommended follow-up after an abnormal Pap test is a critical step in the prevention of cervical cancer. Here, we focused on identifying inconsistencies between self-reported and health department record recommendations for follow-up. Methods: Self-reported recommendations for follow-up were collected by questionnaire from 519 women with abnormal Pap tests in rural Appalachia as part of a trial of the efficacy of patient navigation. Health department medical records were reviewed to collect healthcare provider recommendations. Measures of inconsistency (discordance) were calculated for overall recommendations and each of three particular follow-up recommendations: repeat Pap test, referral for further tests, and other gynecologist referral. Results: The inconsistencies between the recommendation from the health department records and self-reports ranged from 15.0% (repeat Pap test) to 35.3% (gynecologist referral). Inconsistencies were most common among women with a history of abnormal Pap tests and those with more severe initial results. Recommendations for repeat Pap tests were correctly reported most often when the women recalled receiving a letter stating the results. Of greatest concern were the inconsistencies regarding recommendations for referral to a gynecologist. The more severe the Pap test result, the greater the odds of inaccurate self-reports of receiving a referral to a gynecologist for follow-up, p < 0.001. Conclusions: Clinicians should be aware that patients with a history of abnormal results and severe Pap test abnormalities are at risk of misreporting recommendations for follow up.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 152
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Adherence to recommendations for follow-up to abnormal pap tests [J].
Eggleston, Katherine S. ;
Coker, Ann L. ;
Luchok, Kathryn J. ;
Meyer, Tamra E. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 109 (06) :1332-1341
[2]   Understanding barriers for adherence to follow-up care for abnormal pap tests [J].
Eggleston, Katherine S. ;
Coker, Ann L. ;
Prabhu, Irene ;
Cordray, Suzanne T. ;
Luchok, Kathryn J. .
JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2007, 16 (03) :311-330
[3]  
Kentucky Women's Cancer Screening Program, 2011, KENTUCKY WOMENS CANC
[4]   MEASUREMENT OF OBSERVER AGREEMENT FOR CATEGORICAL DATA [J].
LANDIS, JR ;
KOCH, GG .
BIOMETRICS, 1977, 33 (01) :159-174
[5]   Cervical cancer in women with comprehensive health care access: Attributable factors in the screening process [J].
Leyden, WA ;
Manos, MM ;
Geiger, AM ;
Weinmann, S ;
Mouchawar, J ;
Bischofj, K ;
Yood, MU ;
Gilbert, J ;
Taplin, SH .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2005, 97 (09) :675-683
[6]   Barriers to follow-up of abnormal Papanicolaou smears in an urban community health center [J].
McKee, MD ;
Lurio, J ;
Marantz, P ;
Burton, W ;
Mulvihill, M .
ARCHIVES OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 1999, 8 (02) :129-134
[7]   ERRORS IN REPORTING CERVICAL SCREENING AMONG PUBLIC-HEALTH CLINIC PATIENTS [J].
MICHIELUTTE, R ;
DIGNAN, MB ;
WELLS, HB ;
BAHNSON, J ;
SMITH, M ;
WOOTEN, R ;
HALE, LN .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1991, 44 (4-5) :403-408
[8]  
National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP), 2011, NATL BREAST CERVICAL
[9]  
National Cancer Institute, 2010, NAT CANC I FACT SHEE
[10]   Psychosocial predictors of adherence to risk-appropriate cervical cancer screening guidelines: A cross sectional study of women in Ohio Appalachia participating in the Community Awareness Resources and Education (CARE) project [J].
Paskett, Electra D. ;
McLaughlin, John M. ;
Reiter, Paul L. ;
Lehman, Amy M. ;
Rhoda, Dale A. ;
Katz, Mira L. ;
Hade, Erinn M. ;
Post, Douglas M. ;
Ruffin, Mack T. .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2010, 50 (1-2) :74-80