Evaluation of the giant reed (Arundo donax) in horizontal subsurface flow wetlands for the treatment of dairy processing factory wastewater

被引:30
|
作者
Idris, Shaharah Mohd [2 ]
Jones, Paul L. [2 ]
Salzman, Scott A. [3 ]
Croatto, George [4 ]
Allinson, Graeme [1 ]
机构
[1] Dept Primary Ind, Future Farming Syst Res Div, Queenscliff, Vic 3225, Australia
[2] Deakin Univ, Sch Life & Environm Sci, Warrnambool, Vic 3280, Australia
[3] Deakin Univ, Sch Informat Syst, Warrnambool, Vic 3280, Australia
[4] Dept Primary Ind Victoria, Future Farming Syst Res Div, Macleod, Vic 3085, Australia
关键词
Arundo donax; Phragmites australis; Constructed wetlands; Nutrient removal; Dairy factory effluent; Victoria; Australia; CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS; PHRAGMITES-AUSTRALIS; ENERGY CROPS; REMOVAL; BACTERIA; WASTEWATERS; DYNAMICS; SYSTEMS; PLANTS; OXYGEN;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-012-0914-0
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Two emergent macrophytes, Arundo donax and Phragmites australis, were established in experimental horizontal subsurface flow (HSSF), gravel-based constructed wetlands (CWs) and challenged by treated dairy processing factory wastewater with a median electrical conductivity of 8.9 mS cm(-1). The hydraulic loading rate was tested at 3.75 cm day(-1). In general, the plants grew well during the 7-month study period, with no obvious signs of salt stress. The major water quality parameters monitored (biological oxygen demand (BOD), suspended solids (SS) and total nitrogen (TN) but not total phosphorus) were generally improved after the effluent had passed through the CWs. There was no significance different in removal efficiencies between the planted beds and unplanted gravel beds (p > 0.007), nor was there any significant difference in removal efficiencies between the A. donax and P. australis beds for most parameters. BOD, SS and TN removal in the A. donax and P. australis CWs was 69, 95 and 26 % and 62, 97 and 26 %, respectively. Bacterial removal was observed but only to levels that would allow reuse of the effluent for use on non-food crops under Victorian state regulations. As expected, the A. donax CWs produced considerably more biomass (37 +/- 7.2 kg wet weight) than the P. australis CWs (11 +/- 1.4 kg wet weight). This standing crop equates to approximately 179 and 68 tonnes ha(-1) year(-1) biomass (dry weight) for A. donax and P. australis, respectively (assuming a 250-day growing season and single-cut harvest). The performance similarity of the A. donax and P. australis planted CWs indicates that either may be used in HSSF wetlands treating dairy factory wastewater, although the planting of A. donax provides additional opportunities for secondary income streams through utilisation of the biomass produced.
引用
收藏
页码:3525 / 3537
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of the giant reed (Arundo donax) in horizontal subsurface flow wetlands for the treatment of dairy processing factory wastewater
    Shaharah Mohd Idris
    Paul L. Jones
    Scott A. Salzman
    George Croatto
    Graeme Allinson
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2012, 19 : 3525 - 3537
  • [2] Evaluation of the giant reed (Arundo donax) in horizontal subsurface flow wetlands for the treatment of recirculating aquaculture system effluent
    Shaharah Mohd Idris
    Paul L. Jones
    Scott A. Salzman
    George Croatto
    Graeme Allinson
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2012, 19 : 1159 - 1170
  • [3] Evaluation of the giant reed (Arundo donax) in horizontal subsurface flow wetlands for the treatment of recirculating aquaculture system effluent
    Idris, Shaharah Mohd
    Jones, Paul L.
    Salzman, Scott A.
    Croatto, George
    Allinson, Graeme
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2012, 19 (04) : 1159 - 1170
  • [4] Horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands for tertiary treatment of dairy wastewater
    Celeste Schierano, Maria
    Cecilia Panigatti, Maria
    Alejandra Maine, Maria
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHYTOREMEDIATION, 2018, 20 (09) : 895 - 900
  • [5] Evaluation of Glyphosate for Managing Giant Reed (Arundo donax)
    Spencer, David F.
    Tan, Wailun
    Liow, Pui-Sze
    Ksander, Greg G.
    Whitehand, Linda C.
    Weaver, Sharon
    Olson, Jesse
    Newhouser, Mark
    INVASIVE PLANT SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT, 2008, 1 (03) : 248 - 254
  • [6] Evaluation of a Late Summer Imazapyr Treatment for Managing Giant Reed (Arundo donax)
    Spencer, D. F.
    Tan, W.
    Liow, P. -S.
    Ksander, G. G.
    Whitehand, L. C.
    JOURNAL OF AQUATIC PLANT MANAGEMENT, 2009, 47 : 40 - 43
  • [7] An evaluation of flooding risks associated with giant reed (Arundo donax)
    Spencer, David F.
    Colby, Liz
    Norris, Gregory R.
    JOURNAL OF FRESHWATER ECOLOGY, 2013, 28 (03) : 397 - 409
  • [8] Evaluation of stem injection for managing giant reed (Arundo donax)
    Spencer, David F.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART B-PESTICIDES FOOD CONTAMINANTS AND AGRICULTURAL WASTES, 2014, 49 (09) : 633 - 638
  • [9] Selection of macrophytes and substrates to be used in horizontal subsurface flow wetlands for the treatment of a cheese factory wastewater
    Nocetti, Emanuel
    Alejandra Maine, Maria
    Ricardo Hadad, Hernan
    de Las Mercedes Mufarrege, Maria
    Alfonsina Di Luca, Gisela
    Cristina Sanchez, Gabriela
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 745 (745)
  • [10] Performance of the Giant Reed (Arundo donax) in Experimental Wetlands Receiving Variable Loads of Industrial Stormwater
    Idris, Shaharah Mohd
    Jones, Paul L.
    Salzman, Scott A.
    Allinson, Graeme
    WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2012, 223 (02): : 549 - 557