A framework of interfirm open innovation: relationship and knowledge based perspectives

被引:29
作者
Fisher, Gregory J. [1 ]
Qualls, William J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Miami Univ, Oxford, OH 45056 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Urbana, IL USA
关键词
Open innovation; Relationship management; Networks; Knowledge-based view; Interfirm; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; COLLABORATION NETWORKS; COMPLEMENTARITY; COOPERATION; PERFORMANCE; TECHNOLOGY; STRATEGY; EXPLORATION;
D O I
10.1108/JBIM-11-2016-0276
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose This manuscript aims to integrate the relationship and knowledge-based theoretical perspectives of open innovation to provide a framework that identifies and classifies eight critical dimensions that influence the effectiveness of interfirm open innovation. Design/methodology/approach The literature on interfirm open innovation is reviewed. Internal firm factors and external interfirm factors of open innovation are explored. Findings The manuscript identifies four internal firm factors of absorptive capacity, control of knowledge input, relational capability and coordination capability. Further, the synthesis identifies four external firm factors of distribution of knowledge input, appropriation of knowledge output, network position and network diversity. Practical implications The organizing framework facilitates the development of eight research propositions to guide future empirical investigation. Moreover, the findings aid managers in understanding what dimensions they should consider to improve the effectiveness of their interfirm open innovation activities. Originality/value By considering both the relationship and knowledge-based perspectives, the manuscript integrates various perspectives of open innovation to provide direction for practicing managers and for future research on interfirm open innovation.
引用
收藏
页码:240 / 250
页数:11
相关论文
共 76 条
[31]   Customer participation and the trade-off between new product innovativeness and speed to market [J].
Fang, Eric .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2008, 72 (04) :90-104
[32]   Opening up the innovation process: towards an agenda [J].
Gassmann, Oliver .
R & D MANAGEMENT, 2006, 36 (03) :223-228
[33]   Cooperative networks and competitive dynamics: A structural embeddedness perspective [J].
Gnyawali, DR ;
Madhavan, R .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2001, 26 (03) :431-445
[34]   Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm [J].
Hargadon, A ;
Sutton, RI .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1997, 42 (04) :716-749
[35]   Resource complementarity, transformative capacity, and inbound open innovation [J].
Huang, Hao-Chen ;
Lai, Mei-Chi ;
Huang, Wei-Wei .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & INDUSTRIAL MARKETING, 2015, 30 (07) :842-854
[36]   Pie sharing in complex collaboration contexts [J].
Jap, SD .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2001, 38 (01) :86-99
[37]   Some immediate - but negative - effects of openness on product development performance [J].
Knudsen, Mette Praest ;
Mortensen, Thomas Botker .
TECHNOVATION, 2011, 31 (01) :54-64
[38]   Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms [J].
Laursen, K ;
Salter, A .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2006, 27 (02) :131-150
[39]  
Lavie D, 2006, ACAD MANAGE J, V49, P797, DOI 10.2307/20159799
[40]   INNOVATION OBJECTIVES, KNOWLEDGE SOURCES, AND THE BENEFITS OF BREADTH [J].
Leiponen, Aija ;
Helfat, Constance E. .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2010, 31 (02) :224-236