A framework of interfirm open innovation: relationship and knowledge based perspectives

被引:29
作者
Fisher, Gregory J. [1 ]
Qualls, William J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Miami Univ, Oxford, OH 45056 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Urbana, IL USA
关键词
Open innovation; Relationship management; Networks; Knowledge-based view; Interfirm; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; COLLABORATION NETWORKS; COMPLEMENTARITY; COOPERATION; PERFORMANCE; TECHNOLOGY; STRATEGY; EXPLORATION;
D O I
10.1108/JBIM-11-2016-0276
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose This manuscript aims to integrate the relationship and knowledge-based theoretical perspectives of open innovation to provide a framework that identifies and classifies eight critical dimensions that influence the effectiveness of interfirm open innovation. Design/methodology/approach The literature on interfirm open innovation is reviewed. Internal firm factors and external interfirm factors of open innovation are explored. Findings The manuscript identifies four internal firm factors of absorptive capacity, control of knowledge input, relational capability and coordination capability. Further, the synthesis identifies four external firm factors of distribution of knowledge input, appropriation of knowledge output, network position and network diversity. Practical implications The organizing framework facilitates the development of eight research propositions to guide future empirical investigation. Moreover, the findings aid managers in understanding what dimensions they should consider to improve the effectiveness of their interfirm open innovation activities. Originality/value By considering both the relationship and knowledge-based perspectives, the manuscript integrates various perspectives of open innovation to provide direction for practicing managers and for future research on interfirm open innovation.
引用
收藏
页码:240 / 250
页数:11
相关论文
共 76 条
  • [1] Acha V., 2007, ACAD MANAGEMENT P, V1, P1
  • [2] Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study
    Ahuja, G
    [J]. ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2000, 45 (03) : 425 - 455
  • [3] Alexy O, 2009, MIT SLOAN MANAGE REV, V51, P71
  • [4] OPEN VERSUS CLOSED INNOVATION: A MODEL OF DISCOVERY AND DIVERGENCE
    Almirall, Esteve
    Casadesus-Masanell, Ramon
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2010, 35 (01) : 27 - 47
  • [5] [Anonymous], THESIS
  • [6] Argote L., 1999, ORG LEARNING CREATIN, DOI 10.1111/j.1552-6909.1999.tb01970.x
  • [7] Modeling a Paradigm Shift: From Producer Innovation to User and Open Collaborative Innovation
    Baldwin, Carliss
    von Hippel, Eric
    [J]. ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2011, 22 (06) : 1399 - 1417
  • [8] Learning at the boundaries in an "Open Regional Innovation System": A focus on firms' innovation strategies in the Emilia Romagna life science industry
    Belussi, Fiorenza
    Sammarra, Alessia
    Sedita, Silvia Rita
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2010, 39 (06) : 710 - 721
  • [9] Organisational modes for Open Innovation in the bio-pharmaceutical industry: An exploratory analysis
    Bianchi, Mattia
    Cavaliere, Alberto
    Chiaroni, Davide
    Frattini, Federico
    Chiesa, Vittorio
    [J]. TECHNOVATION, 2011, 31 (01) : 22 - 33
  • [10] Blumenfeld P.C., 1996, EDUC RESEARCHER, V25, P37, DOI DOI 10.3102/0013189X025008037