Declining Impact Factor of Radiologic Journals: A Matter for Debate

被引:5
作者
Sardanelli, Francesco [1 ,2 ]
Sconfienza, Luca Maria [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS Policlin San Donato, Serv Radiol, I-20097 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Milan, Dipartimento Sci Biomed Salute, Milan, Italy
关键词
content factor; Eigenfactor; impact factor; Journal Citation Reports; radiologic journals;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.12.10256
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. As reported in the 2011 Journal Citation Reports, despite an increase of the impact factor (IF) for 54% of all journals, only 39% of imaging journals experienced an IF increase. Of the 41 imaging journals with an IF of higher than 2.0, only 17 obtained a higher IF value in 2011 than in 2010 and the IF of most key international imaging journals decreased. How to manage and contrast this decline in IF is still a challenge for the radiologic community all over the world. CONCLUSION. Radiologic journals may try to increase their IF by soliciting important articles, such as meta-analyses, cost-effective analyses, and guidelines, that are frequently published in high-IF clinical journals, and encouraging nonradiologists to submit relevant radiologic-related clinical articles.
引用
收藏
页码:W391 / W393
页数:3
相关论文
共 6 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, COLL RES LIBR NEWS, DOI DOI 10.5860/CRLN.68.5.7804
[2]  
[Anonymous], Journal citation reports
[3]   Content Factor: A Measure of a Journal's Contribution to Knowledge [J].
Bernstein, Joseph ;
Gray, Chancellor F. .
PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (07)
[4]  
Berquist TH, 2012, AJR EDITOR CHIEF NEW, V2, P2
[5]   Evidence-based radiology: why and how? [J].
Sardanelli, Francesco ;
Hunink, Myriam G. ;
Gilbert, Fiona J. ;
Di Leo, Giovanni ;
Krestin, Gabriel P. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2010, 20 (01) :1-15
[6]  
WARREN JR, 1983, LANCET, V1, P1273