Approaches to providing missing transfer parameter values in the ERICA Tool - How well do they work?

被引:35
作者
Brown, J. E. [1 ]
Beresford, N. A. [2 ]
Hosseini, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Radiat Protect Author, Dept Emergency Preparedness & Environm Radioact, NO-1332 Osteras, Norway
[2] Lancaster Environm Ctr, CEH Lancaster, Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Lancaster LA1 4AP, England
基金
欧盟第七框架计划;
关键词
Concentration ratios; Extrapolation guidance; ERICA Tool; Wildlife transfer database; DEFAULT CONCENTRATION RATIOS; RADIONUCLIDE TRANSFER; DERIVATION; WILDLIFE; EXPOSURE; MODELS; BIOTA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvrad.2012.05.005
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A required parameter for the ERICA Tool is the concentration ratio (CR), which is used to describe the transfer from environmental media to a range of organisms. For the original parameterisation of the ERICA Tool, 60% of these values were derived using a variety of extrapolation approaches, including the application of allometric models, the use of values for a similar organism or element with similar biogeochemical behaviour and the use of values from a different ecosystem. Although similar approaches are applied in other assessment systems, there has been little attempt to see how well these approaches perform. In this paper, CR values in the ERICA Tool derived using extrapolation approaches are compared to more recently available empirical data from the IAEA wildlife transfer database. The primary purpose of the default CR database in the ERICA Tool, and other models, is to enable the user to conduct conservative screening assessments. Conservatism was therefore introduced to the analyses by selecting the 95th percentile CR values for subsequent calculations. The extrapolation methodologies are not guaranteed to provide conservative estimates of empirical 95th percentile CRs. For the terrestrial ecosystem, the extrapolation methods provide underpredictions of empirical 95th percentiles as often as they produce overpredictions. In a few cases the underestimation of CR values, when considering all ecosystems, is substantial - by orders of magnitude - which is clearly unacceptable for a screening assessment. Thus, although extrapolation approaches will remain an essential component of screening assessments in the future, because data gaps will always be present, diligence is important in their application. Finally, by synthesizing the results from the current analyses and through other considerations, some recommendations are provided with regards to modifying the original guidance on use of extrapolation approaches in the ERICA Tool. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 411
页数:13
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, HDB PAR VAL PRED RAD
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, HDB ASSESSMENT EXPOS
[3]   Allometric methodology for the calculation of biokinetic parameters for marine biota [J].
Badle, J. Vives i ;
Wilson, R. C. ;
McDonald, P. .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 388 (1-3) :256-269
[4]   Inter-comparison of models to estimate radionuclide activity concentrations in non-human biota [J].
Beresford, N. A. ;
Barnett, C. L. ;
Brown, J. E. ;
Cheng, J. J. ;
Copplestone, D. ;
Filistovic, V. ;
Hosseini, A. ;
Howard, B. J. ;
Jones, S. R. ;
Kamboj, S. ;
Kryshev, A. ;
Nedveckaite, T. ;
Olyslaegers, G. ;
Saxen, R. ;
Sazykina, T. ;
Batlle, J. Vives i ;
Vives-Lynch, S. ;
Yankovich, T. ;
Yu, C. .
RADIATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL BIOPHYSICS, 2008, 47 (04) :491-514
[5]   Derivation of transfer parameters for use within the ERICA Tool and the default concentration ratios for terrestrial biota [J].
Beresford, N. A. ;
Barnett, C. L. ;
Howard, B. J. ;
Scott, W. A. ;
Brown, J. E. ;
Copplestone, D. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY, 2008, 99 (09) :1393-1407
[6]   A new approach to predicting environmental transfer of radionuclides to wildlife: A demonstration for freshwater fish and caesium [J].
Beresford, N. A. ;
Yankovich, T. L. ;
Wood, M. D. ;
Fesenko, S. ;
Andersson, P. ;
Muikku, M. ;
Willey, N. J. .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 463 :284-292
[7]   Predicting the radiation exposure of terrestrial wildlife in the Chernobyl exclusion zone: an international comparison of approaches [J].
Beresford, N. A. ;
Barnett, C. L. ;
Brown, J. E. ;
Cheng, J-J ;
Copplestone, D. ;
Gaschak, S. ;
Hosseini, A. ;
Howard, B. J. ;
Kamboj, S. ;
Nedveckaite, T. ;
Olyslaegers, G. ;
Smith, J. T. ;
Vives i Batlle, J. ;
Vives-Lynch, S. ;
Yu, C. .
JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION, 2010, 30 (02) :341-373
[8]   An international comparison of models and approaches for the estimation of the radiological exposure of non-human biota [J].
Beresford, Nicholas A. ;
Balonov, Mikhail ;
Beaugelin-Seiller, Karine ;
Brown, Justin ;
Copplestone, David ;
Hingston, Joanne L. ;
Horyna, Jan ;
Hosseini, Ali ;
Howard, Brenda J. ;
Kamboj, Sunita ;
Nedveckaite, Tatjana ;
Olyslaegers, Geert ;
Sazykina, Tatiana ;
Batlle, Jordi Vives i ;
Yankovich, Tamara L. ;
Yu, Charley .
APPLIED RADIATION AND ISOTOPES, 2008, 66 (11) :1745-1749
[9]  
Brown J, 2004, ARCTIC, V57, P279
[10]   The ERICA Tool [J].
Brown, J. E. ;
Alfonso, B. ;
Avila, R. ;
Beresford, N. A. ;
Copplestone, D. ;
Proehl, G. ;
Ulanovsky, A. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY, 2008, 99 (09) :1371-1383