Tracing the threads: How five moral concerns (especially Purity) help explain culture war attitudes

被引:449
作者
Koleva, Spassena P. [1 ]
Graham, Jesse [1 ]
Iyer, Ravi [1 ]
Ditto, Peter H. [2 ]
Haidt, Jonathan [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Dept Psychol, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[3] Univ Virginia, Dept Psychol, Charlottesville, VA 22904 USA
关键词
Moral intuitions; Characteristic adaptations; Ideology; Political psychology; Moral values; CONSERVATIVES; LIBERALS; IDEOLOGY; DISGUST;
D O I
10.1016/j.jrp.2012.01.006
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Commentators have noted that the issue stands taken by each side of the American "culture war" lack conceptual consistency and can even seem contradictory. We sought to understand the psychological underpinnings of culture war attitudes using Moral Foundations Theory. In two studies involving 24,739 participants and 20 such issues (e.g. abortion, immigration, same-sex marriage), we found that endorsement of five moral foundations predicted judgments about these issues over and above ideology, age, gender, religious attendance, and interest in politics. Our results suggest that dispositional tendencies, particularly a person's moral intuitions, may underlie, motivate, and unite ideological positions across a variety of issues and offer new insights into the multiple "moral threads" connecting disparate political positions. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:184 / 194
页数:11
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Are political orientations genetically transmitted? [J].
Alford, JR ;
Funk, CL ;
Hibbing, JR .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2005, 99 (02) :153-167
[2]  
[Anonymous], AM CHURCH ATTENDANCE
[3]   The Secret Lives of Liberals and Conservatives: Personality Profiles, Interaction Styles, and the Things They Leave Behind [J].
Carney, Dana R. ;
Jost, John T. ;
Gosling, Samuel D. ;
Potter, Jeff .
POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 29 (06) :807-840
[4]   Party over policy: The dominating impact of group influence on political beliefs [J].
Cohen, GL .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 85 (05) :808-822
[5]  
CONVERSE PE, 1964, IDEOLOGY DISCONTENT
[6]   EQUITY, EQUALITY, AND NEED - WHAT DETERMINES WHICH VALUE WILL BE USED AS BASIS OF DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE [J].
DEUTSCH, M .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 1975, 31 (03) :137-149
[7]   MOTIVATED MORAL REASONING [J].
Ditto, Peter H. ;
Pizarro, David A. ;
Tannenbaum, David .
MORAL JUDGMENT AND DECISION MAKING, 2009, 50 :307-338
[8]   The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model [J].
Duckitt, J ;
Wagner, C ;
du Plessis, I ;
Birum, I .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 83 (01) :75-93
[9]   A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice [J].
Duckitt, J .
ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 33, 2001, 33 :41-113
[10]  
Duckitt J., 2009, SOCIAL PSYCHOL BASES, P292, DOI [10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195320916.003.012, DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780195320916.003.012]