Improved Survival in a Cohort of Trial Participants with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Demonstrates the Need for Updated Prognostic Nomograms

被引:76
作者
Omlin, Aurelius
Pezaro, Carmel
Mukherji, Deborah
Cassidy, Amy Mulick
Sandhu, Shahneen
Bianchini, Diletta
Olmos, David
Ferraldeschi, Roberta
Maier, Gal
Thompson, Emilda
Parker, Chris
Attard, Gerhardt
de Bono, Johann
机构
[1] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, Prostate Canc Targeted Therapy Grp, Sutton SM2 5PT, Surrey, England
[2] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, Drug Dev Unit, Sutton SM2 5PT, Surrey, England
[3] Inst Canc Res, Sutton, Surrey, England
关键词
Castration-resistant prostate cancer; Survival Prognostic factors; Prognostic nomogram; PHASE-II; MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY; ABIRATERONE ACETATE; DOCETAXEL; CYP17; MEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2012.12.029
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Median overall survival (OS) in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) was 13-16 mo in the predocetaxel era. Prognostic nomograms for survival estimation in CRPC were constructed prior to the introduction of docetaxel and other novel treatments. Objective: To examine whether prognostic models still accurately reflect survival in a large cohort of trial participants. Design, setting, and participants: Survival analysis of 442 men with CRPC sequentially treated in clinical trials at our institution from June 2003 to December 2011. Outcome measures and statistical analysis: Predicted survival by Halabi and Smaletz nomograms was compared to observed survival. Cox model multivariate analysis (MVA) used variables at referral, including performance status (PS); levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), haemoglobin (Hb), and albumin; presence of visceral disease, and metastatic disease at diagnosis. Results and limitations: From point of referral, chemotherapy-naive patients had a median OS of 30.6 mo(95% confidence interval [CI], 27.6-36.5 mo). In contrast, predicted survival using the Halabi and Smaletz models was 21 and 18 mo, respectively. In these patients, poor PS, lower Hb level, and increasing LDH level were the strongest predictors in the MVA. In patients referred after chemotherapy, survival from referral was 17.5 mo (95% CI, 16.0-19.5 mo) and increasing LDH level and presence of visceral metastases were the strongest predictors of survival. Median OS from diagnosis of CRPC was 40.7 mo in the overall cohort (95% CI, 36.8-44.0 mo). Clinical trial participation was safe, with low mortality rate. This cohort of men participated in phase 1, 2 and 3 trials and expanded access programs; their data may not reflect survival in all CRPC patients. Conclusions: Due to the impact of highly effective novel therapies on survival, prognostic nomograms in current use require revalidation regarding their ability to predict survival in CRPC. (C) 2012 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:300 / 306
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], J CLIN ONCOL S
[2]  
[Anonymous], N ENGL J ME IN PRESS
[3]  
[Anonymous], J CLIN ONCOL S
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, J CLIN ONCOL S
[5]  
[Anonymous], ASCO GEN CANC S FEBR
[6]  
[Anonymous], J CLIN ONCOL S
[7]  
[Anonymous], J CLIN ONCOL S
[8]  
[Anonymous], J CLIN ONCOL S
[9]   A contemporary prognostic nomogram for men with hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer: A TAX327 study analysis [J].
Armstrong, Andrew J. ;
Garrett-Mayer, Elizabeth S. ;
Yang, Yi-Chun Ou ;
de Wit, Ronald ;
Tannock, Ian F. ;
Eisenberger, Mario .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2007, 13 (21) :6396-6403
[10]   Selective Inhibition of CYP17 With Abiraterone Acetate Is Highly Active in the Treatment of Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer [J].
Attard, Gerhardt ;
Reid, Alison H. M. ;
A'Hern, Roger ;
Parker, Christopher ;
Oommen, Nikhil Babu ;
Folkerd, Elizabeth ;
Messiou, Christina ;
Molife, L. Rhoda ;
Maier, Gal ;
Thompson, Emilda ;
Olmos, David ;
Sinha, Rajesh ;
Lee, Gloria ;
Dowsett, Mitch ;
Kaye, Stan B. ;
Dearnaley, David ;
Kheoh, Thian ;
Molina, Arturo ;
de Bono, Johann S. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (23) :3742-3748