Thermal Tolerance Characteristics of Non-O157 Shiga Toxigenic Strains of Escherichia coli (STEC) in a Beef Broth Model System Are Similar to Those of O157:H7 STEC

被引:9
|
作者
Vasan, Akhila [1 ]
Leong, Wan Mei [1 ]
Ingham, Steve C. [2 ]
Ingham, Barbara H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Food Sci, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Wisconsin Dept Agr Trade & Consumer Protect, Div Food Safety, Madison, WI 53708 USA
关键词
LISTERIA-MONOCYTOGENES; ACID ADAPTATION; HEAT-RESISTANCE; INACTIVATION; SALMONELLA; GROWTH; O157-H7; O111; O26; TEMPERATURE;
D O I
10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-12-500
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The non-O157 Shiga toxigenic Escherichia coli (STEC) serogroups most commonly associated with illness are 026, 045, O103, O111, O121, and O145. In the United States, these serogroups are considered adulterants in raw nonintact beef. To begin to understand the behavior of these pathogens in meat systems, we compared the thermal tolerance of acid-adapted cells of non-O157 STEC and O157:117 STEC in a beef-derived broth. D-58 degrees(C)-values were determined for at least three strains per serogroup, and D-54.6 degrees(C)-values and D-63.6 degrees(C)-values were determined or one strain per serogroup. Each strain was grown to stationary phase in brain heart infusion broth (BIBB; pH 7.0) and inoculated into prewarmed BHIB in a shaking water bath for thermotolerance experiments at 54.6, 58.0, or 63.6 degrees C (three trials per strain). Samples were heated for up to 160 min at 54.6 degrees C, 3 min at 58.0 degrees C, or 45 s at 63.6 degrees C, with periodic sampling followed by rapid cooling and plating on modified Levine's eosin methylene blue agar. For each strain and temperature, the log CFU per milliliter was plotted versus time, and D-values were determined. Across all strains, the least and most heat tolerant STEC serogroups at 58 degrees C were O145 and O157, respectively. D-58 degrees(C)-values in BHIB ranged from 0.44 min for an O145 strain to 1.42 min for an O157:117 strain. D-58 degrees(C)-values for O157 STEC strains were significantly higher than those or at least one strain in each of the non-O157 STEC serogroups (P < 0.05) except or serogroup O103. At 54.6 degrees C, the most heat-resistant STEC strain belonged to serogroup 0103 and was significantly more heat tolerant than the O157:H7 strains (P < 0.05). Grouping the strains, there were no significant differences in heat tolerance between O157 and non-O157 STEC at 63.6 degrees C (P >= 0.05). The z-values for non-O157 STEC strains were comparable to those for O157:H7 STEC strains (P >= 0.05), ranging from 4.1010 5.21 degrees C. These results suggest that thermal processing interventions that target destruction of E. coli O157:117 may have adequate lethality against non-O157 STEC.
引用
收藏
页码:1120 / 1128
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of Commercial Prototype Bacteriophage Intervention Designed for Reducing O157 and Non-O157 Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli (STEC) on Beef Cattle Hide
    Tolen, Tamra N.
    Xie, Yicheng
    Hairgrove, Thomas B.
    Gill, Jason J.
    Taylor, T. Matthew
    FOODS, 2018, 7 (07):
  • [2] Thermal Tolerance of O157 and non-O157 Shiga Toxigenic Strains of Escherichia coli, Salmonella, and Potential Pathogen Surrogates, in Frankfurter Batter and Ground Beef of Varying Fat Levels
    Vasan, Akhila
    Geier, Renae
    Ingham, Steve C.
    Ingham, Barbara H.
    JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2014, 77 (09) : 1501 - 1511
  • [3] Prevalence of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) O157:H7, Six non-O157 STECs, and Salmonella on beef carcasses in Provincially Licensed Abattoirs in Alberta, Canada
    Essendoubi, Saida
    Stashko, Natisha
    So, Iyla
    Gensler, Gary
    Rolheiser, Deana
    Mainali, Chunu
    FOOD CONTROL, 2019, 105 : 226 - 232
  • [4] Comparison of the Diatheva STEC FLUO with BAX System Kits for Detection of O157:H7 and Non-O157 Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli (STEC) in Ground Beef and Bean Sprout Samples Using Different Enrichment Protocols
    Rotundo, Luca
    Fratamico, Pina M.
    Amagliani, Giulia
    Carloni, Elisa
    Omiccioli, Enrica
    Magnani, Mauro
    FOOD ANALYTICAL METHODS, 2018, 11 (10) : 2822 - 2834
  • [5] Antimicrobial Interventions for O157:H7 and Non-O157 Shiga Toxin Producing Escherichia coli on Beef Subprimal and Mechanically Tenderized Steaks
    Liao, Yen-Te
    Brooks, J. Chance
    Martin, Jennifer N.
    Echeverry, Alejandro
    Loneragan, Guy H.
    Brashears, Mindy M.
    JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2015, 78 (03) : 511 - 517
  • [6] Low Variability of Growth Parameters among Six O157:H7 and Non-O157:H7 Escherichia coli Strains
    Fernandez-Escudero, I.
    Caro, I.
    Mateo, J.
    Tejero, J.
    Quinto, E. J.
    JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2014, 77 (11) : 1988 - 1991
  • [7] Thermal Inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Non-O157 Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli Cells in Mechanically Tenderized Veal
    Luchansky, John B.
    Porto-Fett, Anna C. S.
    Shoyer, Bradley A.
    Thippareddi, Harshavardhan
    Amaya, Jesus R.
    Lemler, Michael
    JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2014, 77 (07) : 1201 - 1206
  • [8] Adaptation of O157:H7 and non-O157 Escherichia coli strains in orange juice and subsequent resistance to UV-C radiation
    Oteiza, Juan M.
    Caturla, Magdevis Y. R.
    Do Prado-Silva, Leonardo
    Camara, Antonio A., Jr.
    Barril, Patricia A.
    Sant'Ana, Anderson S.
    Giannuzzi, Leda
    Zaritzky, Noemi
    LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 157
  • [9] Comparison of the fate of the top six non-O157 shiga-toxin producing Escherichia coli (STEC) and E. coil O157:H7 during the manufacture of dry fermented sausages
    Balamurugan, S.
    Ahmed, Rafath
    Gao, Anli
    Strange, Phil
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2017, 259 : 14 - 21
  • [10] Comparative Effect of Heat Shock on Survival of O157:H7 and Non-O157 Shiga Toxigenic Escherichia coil and Salmonella in Lean Beef with or without Moisture-Enhancing Ingredients
    Vasan, Akhila
    Ingham, Steven C.
    Ingham, Barbara H.
    JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2017, 80 (06) : 1002 - 1008