Biopsy Detected Gleason Pattern 5 is Associated with Recurrence, Metastasis and Mortality in a Cohort of Men with High Risk Prostate Cancer

被引:15
作者
Stroup, Sean P. [1 ,2 ]
Moreira, Daniel M. [9 ]
Chen, Zinan [10 ,11 ]
Howard, Lauren [10 ,11 ]
Berger, Jonathan H. [1 ]
Terris, Martha K. [12 ]
Aronson, William J. [4 ,5 ]
Cooperberg, Matthew R. [7 ,8 ]
Amling, Christopher L. [13 ]
Kane, Christopher J. [2 ,3 ]
Freedland, Stephen J. [6 ]
机构
[1] Naval Med Ctr San Diego, Dept Urol, 34800 Bob Wilson Dr, San Diego, CA 92134 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[3] San Diego Vet Affairs Med Ctr, San Diego, CA USA
[4] West Los Angeles Vet Affairs Med Ctr, West Los Angeles, CA USA
[5] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[6] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[7] San Francisco VA Med Ctr, San Francisco, CA USA
[8] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[9] Mayo Clin, Dept Urol, Rochester, MN USA
[10] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Durham, NC USA
[11] Durham Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Durham, NC USA
[12] Augusta Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Augusta, GA USA
[13] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Portland, OR 97201 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; prostatectomy; mortality; neoplasm recurrence; local; neoplasm grading; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; ANTIGEN ERA; STRATIFICATION; SCORE; PROGRESSION; OUTCOMES; DISEASE; GRADE; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2017.07.009
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We evaluated the relative risk of biochemical recurrence, metastasis and death from prostate cancer contributed by biopsy Gleason pattern 5 among men at high risk with Gleason 8-10 disease in the SEARCH (Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital) cohort. Materials and Methods: Men with biopsy Gleason sum 8-10 prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy were evaluated. The cohort was divided into men with Gleason 4 + 4 vs those with any pattern 5 (ie Gleason 3 + 5, 5 + 3, 4 + 5, 5 + 4 or 5 + 5). Predictors of biochemical recurrence, metastases, and prostate cancer specific and overall survival were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier, log rank test and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: We identified 634 men at high risk in the SEARCH database, of whom 394 (62%) had Gleason 4 + 4 and 240 (38%) had Gleason pattern 5 on biopsy. Baseline characteristics did not significantly differ between the groups. On multivariable analysis relative to Gleason 4 + 4 men at high risk with Gleason pattern 5 showed no difference in the risk of biochemical recurrence (HR 1.26, 95% CI 0.99-1.61, p = 0.065). However, they were at significantly greater risk for metastasis (HR 2.55, 95% CI 1.50-4.35, p = 0.001), prostate cancer specific mortality (HR 2.67, 95% CI 0.1.26-5.66, p = 0.010) and overall mortality (HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.09-2.34, p = 0.016). Conclusions: Preoperative subclassification of high risk prostate cancer by biopsy Gleason grade (4 + 4 vs any Gleason pattern 5) identified men at highest risk for progression. Any Gleason 5 on biopsy is associated with a greater risk of metastasis, and prostate cancer specific and overall mortality. Grouping all Gleason 8-10 tumors together as high risk lesions may fail to fully stratify men at highest risk for poor outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1310 / 1316
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, CANCER
[2]  
Bostwick D.G., 1994, J CLIN PATHOL SUPPL, V102, P38
[3]   GLEASON GRADING OF PROSTATIC NEEDLE BIOPSIES - CORRELATION WITH GRADE IN 316 MATCHED PROSTATECTOMIES [J].
BOSTWICK, DG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 1994, 18 (08) :796-803
[4]   Time trends in clinical risk stratification for prostate cancer: Implications for outcomes (data from CaPSURE) [J].
Cooperberg, MR ;
Lubeck, DP ;
Mehta, SS ;
Carroll, PR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 170 (06) :S21-S25
[5]   Cancer-specific mortality after surgery or radiation for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer managed during the prostate-specific antigen era [J].
D'Amico, AV ;
Moul, J ;
Carroll, PR ;
Sun, L ;
Lubeck, D ;
Chen, MH .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (11) :2163-2172
[6]   Pretreatment predictors of time to cancer specific death after prostate specific antigen failure [J].
D'Amico, AV ;
Cote, K ;
Loffredo, M ;
Renshaw, AA ;
Chen, MH .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (04) :1320-1324
[7]   A Contemporary Prostate Cancer Grading System: A Validated Alternative to the Gleason Score [J].
Epstein, Jonathan I. ;
Zelefsky, Michael J. ;
Sjoberg, Daniel D. ;
Nelson, Joel B. ;
Egevad, Lars ;
Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina ;
Vickers, Andrew J. ;
Parwani, Anil V. ;
Reuter, Victor E. ;
Fine, Samson W. ;
Eastham, James A. ;
Wiklund, Peter ;
Han, Misop ;
Reddy, Chandana A. ;
Ciezki, Jay P. ;
Nyberg, Tommy ;
Klein, Eric A. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (03) :428-435
[8]   Is biopsy Gleason score independently associated with biochemical progression following radical prostatectomy after adjusting for pathological Gleason score? [J].
Fitzsimons, Nicholas J. ;
Presti, Joseph C., Jr. ;
Kane, Christopher J. ;
Terris, Martha K. ;
Aronson, William J. ;
Amling, Christopher L. ;
Freedland, Stephen J. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 176 (06) :2453-2458
[9]   PREDICTION OF PROGNOSIS FOR PROSTATIC ADENOCARCINOMA BY COMBINED HISTOLOGICAL GRADING AND CLINICAL STAGING [J].
GLEASON, DF ;
MELLINGE.GT .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1974, 111 (01) :58-64
[10]   Outcome of Gleason 3+5=8 Prostate Cancer Diagnosed on Needle Biopsy: Prognostic Comparison with Gleason 4+4=8 [J].
Harding-Jackson, Nicholas ;
Kryvenko, Oleksandr N. ;
Whittington, Elizabeth E. ;
Eastwood, Daniel C. ;
Tjionas, George A. ;
Jorda, Merce ;
Iczkowski, Kenneth A. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 196 (04) :1076-1081