Conservation practice complementarity and timing of on-farm adoption

被引:17
作者
Canales, Elizabeth [1 ]
Bergtold, Jason S. [2 ]
Williams, Jeffery R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Mississippi State Univ, Dept Agr Econ, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
[2] Kansas State Univ, Dept Agr Econ, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
关键词
adoption; complementarities; conservation practices; continuous no-till; cost-share programs; cover crops; duration analysis; variable rate application of inputs; COVER CROPS; NO-TILL; SEQUENTIAL ADOPTION; WEED MANAGEMENT; UNITED-STATES; AGRICULTURE; TECHNOLOGY; INFORMATION; DIFFUSION; WHEAT;
D O I
10.1111/agec.12591
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
The adoption of conservation practices is a dynamic process. Factors that vary over time can affect farmers' decision to adopt and adoption timing. We used a duration model to evaluate the farmer's adoption time for continuous no-till (CNT), cover crops (CCs), and the variable-rate application of inputs (VRA). We found that producers who had previously adopted soil conservation practices were more likely to adopt additional complementary practices. Farmers using crop rotation adopted CNT and CCs approximately 48% and 62% faster than farmers without a crop rotation, respectively. The CC adoption time was also reduced by 70% for farmers who had adopted CNT. Complementarities between conservation practices may enhance the benefits from adoption and allow farmers to adopt bundles of conservation practices more quickly over time. This can be taken advantage of in conservation programs by promoting or requiring practices first that enhance adoption of other practices. We also found important heterogeneity in the adoption speed associated with farm management characteristics, producers' attitudes, weather patterns, and crop prices.
引用
收藏
页码:777 / 791
页数:15
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   The diffusion of new agricultural technologies: The case of crossbred-cow technology in Tanzania [J].
Abdulai, A ;
Huffman, WE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 87 (03) :645-659
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, FED RES EC DAT
[3]   Residue management and tillage effects on soil-water storage and grain yield of dryland wheat and sorghum for a clay loam in Texas [J].
Baumhardt, RL ;
Jones, OR .
SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2002, 68 (02) :71-82
[4]  
Bergtold J. S., 2012, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, V44, P99
[5]  
Bergtold J. S., 2010, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, V42, P211
[6]   A review of economic considerations for cover crops as a conservation practice [J].
Bergtold, Jason S. ;
Ramsey, Steven ;
Maddy, Lucas ;
Williams, Jeffery R. .
RENEWABLE AGRICULTURE AND FOOD SYSTEMS, 2019, 34 (01) :62-76
[7]   The economic potential of precision nitrogen application with wheat based on plant sensing [J].
Biermacher, Jon T. ;
Brorsen, B. Wade ;
Epplin, Francis M. ;
Solie, John B. ;
Raun, William R. .
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 40 (04) :397-407
[8]   Addition of Cover Crops Enhances No-Till Potential for Improving Soil Physical Properties [J].
Blanco-Canqui, Humberto ;
Mikha, Maysoon M. ;
Presley, DeAnn R. ;
Claassen, Mark M. .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2011, 75 (04) :1471-1482
[9]   Importance of cover crops in alleviating negative effects of reduced soil tillage and promoting soil fertility in a winter wheat cropping system [J].
Buechi, Lucie ;
Wendling, Marina ;
Amosse, Camille ;
Necpalova, Magdalena ;
Charles, Raphael .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 256 :92-104
[10]  
Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), 2019, PPI COMM DAT FARM PR