Follow-up of the re-evaluation of sulfur dioxide (E 220), sodium sulfite (E 221), sodium bisulfite (E 222), sodium metabisulfite (E 223), potassium metabisulfite (E 224), calcium sulfite (E 226), calcium bisulfite (E 227) and potassium bisulfite (E 228)

被引:5
作者
Younes, Maged
Aquilina, Gabriele
Castle, Laurence
Engel, Karl-Heinz
Fowler, Paul J.
Fernandez, Maria Jose Frutos
Furst, Peter
Gundert-Remy, Ursula
Gurtler, Rainer
Husoy, Trine
Manco, Melania
Mennes, Wim
Moldeus, Peter
Passamonti, Sabina
Shah, Romina
Waalkens-Berendsen, Ine
Boon, Polly
Cheyns, Karlien
Crebelli, Riccardo
FitzGerald, Rex
Lambre, Claude
Mirat, Manuela
Ulbrich, Beate
Vleminckx, Christiane
Mech, Agnieszka
Rincon, Ana Maria
Tard, Alexandra
Horvath, Zsuzsanna
Wright, Matthew
机构
关键词
sulfur dioxide; E; 220; sodium sulfite; 221; CAS; 7757-83-7; sodium bisulfite; 222; 7631-90-5; sodium metabisulfite; 223; 7681-57-4; potassium metabisulfite; 224; 16731-55-8; calcium sulfite; 226; 10257-55-3; calcium bisulfite; 227; potassium bisulfite; 228; food additive; VISUAL-EVOKED POTENTIALS; BONE-MARROW-CELLS; THIAMINE-DEFICIENCY; LIPID-PEROXIDATION; OXIDATIVE STRESS; INGESTED SULFITE; MITOCHONDRIAL DYSFUNCTION; ANTIOXIDANT STATUS; STRUCTURAL-CHANGES; HUMAN-LYMPHOCYTES;
D O I
10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7594
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Sulfur dioxide-sulfites (E 220-228) were re-evaluated in 2016, resulting in the setting of a temporary ADI of 0.7 mg SO2 equivalents/kg bw per day. Following a European Commission call for data, the present follow-up opinion assesses data provided by interested business operators (IBOs) and additional evidence identified in the publicly available literature. No new biological or toxicological data addressing the data gaps described in the re-evaluation were submitted by IBOs. Taking into account data identified from the literature search, the Panel concluded that there was no substantial reduction in the uncertainties previously identified in the re-evaluation. Therefore, the Panel considered that the available toxicity database was inadequate to derive an ADI and withdrew the current temporary group acceptable daily intake (ADI). A margin of exposure (MOE) approach was considered appropriate to assess the risk for these food additives. A lower confidence limit of the benchmark dose of 38 mg SO2 equivalents/kg bw per day, which is lower than the previous reference point of 70 mg SO2 equivalents/kg bw per day, was estimated based on prolonged visual evoked potential latency. An assessment factor of 80 was applied for the assessment of the MoE. At the estimated dietary exposures, when using a refined exposure scenario (Data set D), MOEs at the maximum of 95th percentile ranges were below 80 for all population groups except for adolescents. The dietary exposures estimated using the maximum permitted levels would result in MOEs below 80 in all population groups at the maximum of the ranges of the mean, and for most of the population groups at both minimum and maximum of the ranges at the 95th percentile. The Panel concluded that this raises a safety concern for both dietary exposure scenarios. The Panel also performed a risk assessment for toxic elements present in sulfur dioxide-sulfites (E 220-228), based on data submitted by IBOs, and concluded that the maximum limits in the EU specifications for arsenic, lead and mercury should be lowered and a maximum limit for cadmium should be introduced.
引用
收藏
页数:139
相关论文
共 162 条
  • [1] Role of astrocytes in thiamine deficiency
    Afadlal, Szeifoul
    Labetoulle, Remi
    Hazell, Alan S.
    [J]. METABOLIC BRAIN DISEASE, 2014, 29 (04) : 1061 - 1068
  • [2] Agar A, 2000, ARCH ENVIRON CON TOX, V39, P257
  • [3] Guidance for submission for food additive evaluations
    Aguilar, Fernando
    Crebelli, Riccardo
    Dusemund, Birgit
    Galtier, Pierre
    Gilbert, John
    Gott, David
    Gundert-Remy, Ursula
    Konig, Jurgen
    Lambre, Claude
    Leblanc, Jean -Charles
    Mortensen, Alicja
    Mosesso, Pasquale
    Parent-Massin, Dominique
    Stankovic, Ivan
    Tobback, Paul
    Waalkens-Berendsen, Me
    Woutersen, Rudolf Antonius
    Wright, Matthew
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2012, 10 (07)
  • [4] Scientific Opinion on the re-evaluation of sulfur dioxide (E 220), sodium sulfite (E 221), sodium bisulfite (E 222), sodium metabisulfite (E 223), potassium metabisulfite (E 224), calcium sulfite (E 226), calcium bisulfite (E 227) and potassium bisulfite (E 228) as food additives
    Aguilar, Fernando
    Crebelli, Riccardo
    Di Domenico, Alessandro
    Dusemund, Birgit
    Frutos, Maria Jose
    Galtier, Pierre
    Gott, David
    Gundert-Remy, Ursula
    Lambre, Claude
    Leblanc, Jean-Charles
    Lindtner, Oliver
    Moldeus, Peter
    Mortensen, Alicja
    Mosesso, Pasquale
    Parent-Massin, Dominique
    Oskarsson, Agneta
    Stankovic, Ivan
    Waalkens-Berendsen, Ine
    Woutersen, Rudolf Antonius
    Wright, Matthew
    Younes, Maged
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2016, 14 (04)
  • [5] Scientific Opinion on Lead in Food EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM)
    Alexander, Jan
    Benford, Diane
    Boobis, Alan
    Ceccatelli, Sandra
    Cravedi, Jean-Pierre
    Di Domenico, Alessandro
    Doerge, Daniel
    Dogliotti, Eugenia
    Edler, Lutz
    Fanner, Peter
    Filipic, Metka
    Fink-Gremmels, Johanna
    Fuerst, Peter
    Guerin, Thierry
    Knutsen, Helle Katrine
    Machala, Miroslav
    Mutti, Antonio
    Schlatter, Josef
    van Leeuwen, Rolaf
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2010, 8 (04)
  • [6] Incidence of asthma among workers exposed to sulphur dioxide and other irritant gases
    Andersson, E
    Knutsson, A
    Hagberg, S
    Nilsson, T
    Karlsson, B
    Alfredsson, L
    Torén, K
    [J]. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2006, 27 (04) : 720 - 725
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2012, Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment, Chapter R.8: characterisation of dose concentration-response for human health