Derivation of combined species sensitivity distributions for acute toxicity of pyrethroids to aquatic animals

被引:24
作者
Giddings, Jeffrey M. [1 ]
Wirtz, Jeffrey [1 ]
Campana, David [1 ]
Dobbs, Michael [2 ]
机构
[1] Compliance Serv Int, 7501 Bridgeport Way West, Lakewood, WA 98499 USA
[2] Bayer CropSci, 2 TW Alexander Dr, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA
关键词
Pyrethroids; Aquatic toxicity; Species sensitivity distribution; Crustaceans; Insects; Fish;
D O I
10.1007/s10646-019-02018-0
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The aquatic toxicity profiles of synthetic pyrethroid insecticides are remarkably similar, and results for a large number of species can be combined across compounds in Species Sensitivity Distributions (SSDs). Normalizing acute toxicity values (median lethal concentrations, LC50s) for each species and each pyrethroid to the LC50 of the same pyrethroid to the freshwater amphipod Hyalella azteca (the most sensitive species to all pyrethroids tested) enabled expression of LC50s as Hyalella equivalents that can be pooled across pyrethroids. The resulting normalized LC50s (geometric means for each species across pyrethroids) were analyzed using SSDs. Based on tests with measured exposure concentrations, the fifth percentiles (Hazard Concentrations, HC5s) of the SSDs were 4.8 Hyalella equivalents for arthropods (36 species) and 256 Hyalella equivalents for fish (24 species). HC5 values are useful as effects metrics for screening-level risk assessments, and the full SSDs can be integrated with estimated exposure distributions for higher-level risk characterization. The combined pyrethroid SSDs provide a more taxonomically representative and statistically robust basis for risk characterization than data for the most sensitive single species or SSDs based on data for a single pyrethroid alone, and are especially useful for pyrethroids that have been tested with smaller numbers of species.
引用
收藏
页码:242 / 250
页数:9
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1999, AQ DRAFT REP EC COMM
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2001, GUID DOC DER ENV RIS
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2004, OFF PEST PROGR EC AS
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2002, SPECIES SENSITIVITY, DOI DOI 10.1201/9781420032314
  • [5] Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, 2007, PROT DER WAT QUAL GU
  • [6] Maximum permissible and negligible concentrations for some organic substances and pesticides[J]. Crommentuijn, T;Sijm, D;de Bruijn, J;van Leeuwen, K;van de Plassche, E. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2000(04)
  • [7] Insecticide species sensitivity distributions: Importance of test species selection and relevance to aquatic ecosystems[J]. Maltby, L;Blake, N;Brock, TCM;Van Den Brink, PJ. ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2005(02)
  • [8] Neter J., 1990, APPL STAT MODELS
  • [9] Stephan C.E., 1985, GUIDELINES DERIVING
  • [10] United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2016, PREL COMP ENV FAT EC