Agricultural use of digestate for horticultural crop production and improvement of soil properties

被引:261
作者
Alburquerque, J. A. [1 ]
de la Fuente, C. [1 ]
Campoy, M. [1 ]
Carrasco, L. [1 ]
Najera, I. [2 ]
Baixauli, C. [2 ]
Caravaca, F. [1 ]
Roldan, A. [1 ]
Cegarra, J. [1 ]
Bernal, M. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] CSIC, Ctr Edafol & Biol Aplicada Segura, Dept Soil & Water Conservat & Organ Waste Managem, Murcia 30100, Spain
[2] Fdn Ruralcaja Grp CRM, Valencia 46200, Spain
关键词
Digestate; Crop production; Fertiliser; Soil quality; Watermelon; Cauliflower; NITROGEN; TILLAGE; COMPOST;
D O I
10.1016/j.eja.2012.06.001
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The usefulness of a digestate from an anaerobic codigestion process as a fertiliser product was evaluated in a field experiment using two horticultural crops (watermelon and cauliflower), during two successive growing seasons. The effects of the digestate were compared with those of a traditional organic amendment (cattle manure) and a conventional mineral fertiliser. Digestate addition to soil provided a source of available nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus) in the short-term and had positive effects on soil biological properties such as microbial biomass and enzyme activities, compared to the non-amended soil. The digestate application to soil led to yields comparable to the mineral fertilisation for the summer watermelon crop. However, for the winter cauliflower crop, only plots treated with the mineral fertiliser had good production. Nitrogen from the digestate is rapidly and highly available for plant growth in the short-term but also can be easily lost, together with a slow rate of microbial processes due to low temperatures, could reduce the fertilising capacity of the digestate. This seemed to be the main limiting factor for the winter cauliflower crop, where digestate or cattle manure, used as basal dressing, were not enough to satisfy the crop demand for nitrogen during its whole growth cycle. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 128
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Alburquerque J.A., AGR ECOSYST IN PRESS
[2]   Soil aggregation status and rhizobacteria in the mycorrhizosphere [J].
Andrade, G ;
Mihara, KL ;
Linderman, RG ;
Bethlenfalvay, GJ .
PLANT AND SOIL, 1998, 202 (01) :89-96
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, OFF J EUR UNION L
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, BOE, V151, P52291
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2010, 110 BSI PAS
[6]   WATER-STABLE AGGREGATES AND ORGANIC-MATTER FRACTIONS IN CONVENTIONAL-TILLAGE AND NO-TILLAGE SOILS [J].
BEARE, MH ;
HENDRIX, PF ;
COLEMAN, DC .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1994, 58 (03) :777-786
[7]  
Bermejo G., 2010, P GREEN WEEK SCI C 2
[8]   COMPARISON OF SEVERAL ORGANIC AMENDMENTS WITH A CHEMICAL FERTILIZER FOR VEGETABLE PRODUCTION [J].
BLATT, CR .
SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 1991, 47 (3-4) :177-191
[9]   Changes in microbial and soil properties following compost treatment of degraded temperate forest soils [J].
Borken, W ;
Muhs, A ;
Beese, F .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2002, 34 (03) :403-412
[10]   Application of winery and distillery waste composts to a Jumilla (SE Spain) vineyard: Effects on the characteristics of a calcareous sandy-loam soil [J].
Bustamante, M. A. ;
Said-Pullicino, D. ;
Agullo, E. ;
Andreu, J. ;
Paredes, C. ;
Moral, R. .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 140 (1-2) :80-87