Modality Difference in N2 and P3 Components Between Visual and Auditory Go/No-Go Paradigms

被引：5

作者：

Nakata, Hiroki ^{[1
]}

Arakawa, Natsumi ^{[2
]}

Suzuki, Chiharu ^{[2
]}

Nakayama, Michiko ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Nara Womens Univ, Fac Human Life & Environm, Dept Hlth Sci, Kitauoya Nishi Machi, Nara 6308506, Japan

[2] Nara Womens Univ, Fac Letters, Dept Psychol, Nara, Japan

来源：

JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY | 2016年 / 30卷 / 04期

关键词：

no-go; nogo; P300; response inhibition; EEG; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS; RESPONSE-INHIBITION; ERP COMPONENTS; STIMULUS PROBABILITY; TASK; CONFLICT; LATENCY; EXECUTION; TIME; PERFORMANCE;

D O I：

10.1027/0269-8803/a000163

中图分类号：

B84 [心理学];

学科分类号：

04 ; 0402 ;

摘要：

We investigated the modality difference in the N2 and P3 components of event-related potentials (ERPs) between visual and auditory Go/No-go paradigms. We evaluated the relationship between RT and the amplitudes and latencies of N2 and P3 in visual and auditory Go/No-go paradigms. No significant differences were observed in the latencies of N2 and P3 between visual and auditory paradigms. Significant correlations were observed between RT and the latency of P3 in the visual and auditory paradigms. In contrast, the amplitudes of N2 and P3 were significantly larger in the visual paradigm than in the auditory paradigm. A significant correlation was observed between RT and the amplitude of P3 only in the auditory paradigm. These results suggested that there were two neural networks for the response execution and inhibitory function, common and uncommon, that depended on the stimulus modality.

引用

页码：131 / 140

页数：10

共 40 条

[1] Speed-accuracy modulation in case of conflict: the roles of activation and inhibition [J].

Band, GPH ;

Ridderinkhof, KR ;

van der Molen, MW .

PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2003, 67 (04) :266-279

[2] Localizing P300 generators in visual target and distractor processing: A combined event-related potential and functional magnetic resonance imaging study [J].

Bledowski, C ;

Prvulovic, D ;

Hoechstetter, K ;

Scherg, M ;

Wibral, M ;

Goebel, R ;

Linden, DEJ .

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2004, 24 (42) :9353-9360

[3] Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict: Effects of frequency, inhibition and errors [J].

Braver, TS ;

Barch, DM ;

Gray, JR ;

Molfese, DL ;

Snyder, A .

CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2001, 11 (09) :825-836

[4] Inhibition, response mode, and stimulus probability: a comparative event-related potential study [J].

Bruin, KJ ;

Wijers, AA .

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 113 (07) :1172-1182

[5] IS THE P300 COMPONENT A MANIFESTATION OF CONTEXT UPDATING [J].

DONCHIN, E ;

COLES, MGH .

BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 1988, 11 (03) :357-374

[6] The N2 in go/no-go tasks reflects conflict monitoring not response inhibition [J].

Donkers, FCL ;

van Boxtel, GJM .

BRAIN AND COGNITION, 2004, 56 (02) :165-176

[7] The effect of response execution on P3 latency, reaction time, and movement time [J].

Doucet, C ;

Stelmack, RM .

PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1999, 36 (03) :351-363

[8] EFFECTS OF ATTENTION AND STIMULUS PROBABILITY ON ERPS IN A GO/NOGO TASK [J].

EIMER, M .

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 35 (02) :123-138

[9] Inhibition-related ERP components: Variation with modality, age, and time-on-task [J].

Falkenstein, M ;

Hoormann, J ;

Hohnsbein, J .

JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 16 (03) :167-175

[10] LATE ERP COMPONENTS IN VISUAL AND AUDITORY GO NOGO TASKS [J].

FALKENSTEIN, M ;

KOSHLYKOVA, NA ;

KIROJ, VN ;

HOORMANN, J ;

HOHNSBEIN, J .

EVOKED POTENTIALS-ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1995, 96 (01) :36-43

← 1 2 3 4 →