Robot-Assisted Colorectal Surgery

被引：0
作者：
Kim, Young Il [1 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Ulsan, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Colon & Rectal Surg,Coll Med, Seoul 05505, South Korea
来源：
EWHA MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2022年 / 45卷 / 04期
关键词：
Robot surgical procedures; Colonic neoplasms; Rectal neoplasms; Colorectal disease; LOW-RECTAL-CANCER; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; OPEN-LABEL; TRIAL; RECTOPEXY; SURVIVAL; PROLAPSE; OUTCOMES;
D O I：
10.12771/emj.2022.e10
中图分类号：
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号：
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要：
Minimally invasive surgery for colorectal disease has now become the standard treatment in Republic of Korea. However, there are limitations to the laparoscopic approach, such as an unstable camera support, a limited range of motion, and poor ergonomics. Recent advances in technology have led to the introduction of robotic surgical systems in colorectal surgery to overcome these shortcomings. Robot-assisted colorectal surgery has clear advantages in many aspects. Surgery involving the rectum benefits the most among colorectal diseases owing to technical difficulties in rectum dissection. The concept of robotic surgery is not different from laparoscopic surgery in that it is a minimally invasive surgery, and abundant research demonstrates comparable results from both modalities for postoperative complications, oncological outcomes, and functional outcomes. However, the cost of robot-assisted surgery limits surgeons to performing robotic surgeries in only selected cases. Improvements regarding cost-effectiveness and more convincing studies that support benefits of robotic surgery are needed to popularize robot-assisted colorectal surgery.
引用
收藏
页数：7
相关论文
共 48 条
[31]  
Nelson H, 2004, NEW ENGL J MED, V350, P2050
[32]   Long-term Oncologic Outcomes of Robotic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer A Comparative Study With Laparoscopic Surgery [J].
Park, Eun Jung ;
Cho, Min Soo ;
Baek, Se Jin ;
Hur, Hyuk ;
Min, Byung Soh ;
Baik, Seung Hyuk ;
Lee, Kang Young ;
Kim, Nam Kyu .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2015, 261 (01) :129-137
[33]   Randomized clinical trial of robot-assisted versus standard laparoscopic right colectomy [J].
Park, J. S. ;
Choi, G-S ;
Park, S. Y. ;
Kim, H. J. ;
Ryuk, J. P. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 99 (09) :1219-1226
[34]   Long-term oncologic after robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy: a prospective randomized study [J].
Park, Jun Seok ;
Kang, Hyun ;
Park, Soo Yeun ;
Kim, Hye Jin ;
Woo, In Teak ;
Park, In-Kyu ;
Choi, Gyu-Seog .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 33 (09) :2975-2981
[35]  
Patriti A, 2009, JSLS-J SOC LAPAROEND, V13, P176
[36]   Robotic Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer Technical Controversies and a Systematic Review on the Perioperative, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes [J].
Piozzi, Guglielmo Niccolo ;
Kim, Seon Hahn .
ANNALS OF COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2021, 37 (06) :351-367
[37]   Best approaches to rectal prolapse [J].
Rajasingh, Charlotte M. ;
Gurland, Brooke H. .
ANNALS OF LAPAROSCOPIC AND ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 2022, 7
[38]   Is robotic ventral mesh rectopexy better than laparoscopy in the treatment of rectal prolapse and obstructed defecation? A meta-analysis [J].
Ramage, L. ;
Georgiou, P. ;
Tekkis, P. ;
Tan, E. .
TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2015, 19 (07) :381-389
[39]   Robotic-assisted ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease: outcomes from an early national experience [J].
Raskin, Elizabeth R. ;
Gorrepati, Madhu L. ;
Mehendale, Shilpa ;
Gaertner, Wolfgang B. .
JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2019, 13 (03) :429-434
[40]  
Rencuzogullari A, 2016, SURG LAPARO ENDO PER, V26, pE37, DOI 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000269
12345