Evaluation of laboratory performance in IMEP water interlaboratory comparisons

被引:15
作者
Bednarova, M
Aregbe, Y [1 ]
Harper, C
Taylor, PDP
机构
[1] Commiss European Communities, Joint Res Ctr, Inst Reference Mat & Measurements, BE-2440 Geel, Belgium
[2] Czech Accreditat Inst, Prague, Czech Republic
关键词
measurement performance evaluation; IMEP; Naji-plots; E-n number; uncertainty; trace elements; water directive;
D O I
10.1007/s00769-005-0031-6
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The aim of International Evaluation Programme (IMEP) is to present objectively the quality of chemical measurements. Participants in IMEP compare their reported measurement results with independent external certified reference values with demonstrated traceability and uncertainty, as evaluated according to international guidelines. Three major interlaboratory comparisons (ILCs), IMEP-6, IMEP-9 and IMEP-12, on trace elements in water were carried out from 1994 to 2000. Participants' results for Cd, Fe and Pb concentrations from these three different IMEP water ILCs were compared by means of suitable performance indicators. The performance evaluation criteria were set according to the requirements stated in the Council Directive 98/83/EC of 3 November 1998 on the quality of water intended for human consumption. Two different performance indicators were selected for evaluation of the individual participants' results: the commonly used z-score and the not so well-known E (n) number. The group performance indicator is based on the variation of z-scores. To assess the individual measurement performance, not only the deviation of the reported measurement values from the certified reference value, but also criteria for maximum and minimum acceptable uncertainties were taken into account. The participants' performance is also reviewed by means of using a simple graphical tool, called "Naji-plots".
引用
收藏
页码:617 / 626
页数:10
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, 135282002 ISO DIS
[2]  
[Anonymous], QUANT UNC AN MEAS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1995, GUID EXPR UNC MEAS
[4]  
AREGBE Y, 1195 GLOB WATCH WMO
[5]  
ASEGBE Y, 2004, ACCREDIT QUAL ASSUR, V9, P323
[6]  
Barnett V., 1984, Outliers in Statistical Data, V2nd
[7]   Requirements vs acceptability in proficiency testing schemes and other interlaboratory comparisons [J].
Boley, NP ;
De Bièvre, P ;
Taylor, PDP ;
Uldall, A .
ACCREDITATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2001, 6 (06) :244-251
[8]   STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF INTERLABORATORY TESTS [J].
DAVIES, PL .
FRESENIUS ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ANALYTISCHE CHEMIE, 1988, 331 (05) :513-519
[9]  
HORWITZ W, 1982, ANAL CHEM, V54, pA67, DOI 10.1021/ac00238a002
[10]  
[ISO IEC], 1997, 431 ISO IEC