Incontinence after radical prostatectomy: surgical treatment options

被引:0
|
作者
Klingler, HC [1 ]
Marberger, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vienna, Dept Urol, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
关键词
incontinence; prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy; surgery;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose of review Stress urinary incontinence is an uncommon finding in healthy men. Following radical prostatectomy, however, stress urinary incontinence is the most important complication influencing patient morbidity following surgery and influencing satisfaction, regardless of the surgical technique applied. Conservative treatment options centre at early restoration of bladder and pelvic floor function. When significant and bothersome stress urinary incontinence persists, even after six to 12 months active treatment follow-up, surgical restoration of continence seems advisable. Recent findings Two themes emerge in reviewing the recent publications in this field. Implantation of the hydraulic artificial urinary sphincter is still the gold standard, particularly in severe cases. Alternatively, new techniques and other artificial materials are gaining favour, aiming at a large cohort of patients with less severe incontinence, which have been not treated or overtreated so far. Advances in both areas are covered within this review article in detail. Summary For treatment of incontinence following prostatectomy, a large variety of surgical techniques are readily available and have proven to be helpful tools in making patients' uncomfortable lives much easier. In addition, the wide armamentarium of artificial materials and techniques may help to choose the proper surgical technique for every patients' needs.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 64
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Management of Urinary Incontinence after Radical Prostatectomy
    Thomas R. Jarvis
    Jaspreet S. Sandhu
    Current Urology Reports, 2014, 15
  • [2] Management of Urinary Incontinence after Radical Prostatectomy
    Jarvis, Thomas R.
    Sandhu, Jaspreet S.
    CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2014, 15 (07)
  • [3] The use of polydimethylsiloxane in the treatment of incontinence after radical prostatectomy
    Colombo, T
    Augustin, H
    Breinl, E
    Schips, L
    Hubmer, G
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 80 (06): : 923 - 926
  • [4] Systematic review of surgical treatment of post radical prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence
    Crivellaro, Simone
    Morlacco, Alessandro
    Bodo, Giovanni
    Agro', Enrico Finazzi
    Gozzi, Christian
    Pistolesi, Donatella
    Del Popolo, Giulio
    Ficarra, Vincenzo
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2016, 35 (08) : 875 - 881
  • [5] Post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence: a review of surgical treatment options
    Wilson, Liam C.
    Gilling, Peter J.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 107 : 7 - 10
  • [6] Urinary incontinence after radical retropubic prostatectomy: the outcome of a surgical technique
    Moinzadeh, A
    Shunaigat, AN
    Libertino, JA
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 92 (04) : 355 - 359
  • [7] Urinary incontinence and neuropathy after radical prostatectomy: diagnosis and treatment
    Ventimiglia, Bernardo
    Sigona, Matilde
    Di Dio, Agata
    Puglisi, Tiziana
    Costantino, Giuseppe
    UROLOGIA JOURNAL, 2015, 82 (01) : 42 - 45
  • [8] Utilization of surgical procedures and racial disparity in the treatment of urinary incontinence after prostatectomy
    Gupta, Shubham
    Ding, Laura
    Granieri, Michael
    Ngoc-Bich Le
    Peterson, Andrew C.
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2016, 35 (06) : 733 - 737
  • [9] Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy - experience of the last 100 cases
    Sosnowski, Roman
    Szymanski, Michal
    Wolski, Jan Karol
    Nadolski, Tomasz
    Kalinowski, Tomasz
    Demkow, Tomasz
    Peczkowski, Piotr
    Pilichowska, Malgorzata
    Ligaj, Marcin
    Michalski, Wojciech
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 64 (04) : 213 - 217
  • [10] Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy
    Krull F.
    Pahernik S.
    Pandey A.
    Journal für Urologie und Urogynäkologie/Österreich, 2019, 26 (3): : 98 - 102