Incontinence after radical prostatectomy: surgical treatment options

被引:0
作者
Klingler, HC [1 ]
Marberger, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vienna, Dept Urol, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
关键词
incontinence; prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy; surgery;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose of review Stress urinary incontinence is an uncommon finding in healthy men. Following radical prostatectomy, however, stress urinary incontinence is the most important complication influencing patient morbidity following surgery and influencing satisfaction, regardless of the surgical technique applied. Conservative treatment options centre at early restoration of bladder and pelvic floor function. When significant and bothersome stress urinary incontinence persists, even after six to 12 months active treatment follow-up, surgical restoration of continence seems advisable. Recent findings Two themes emerge in reviewing the recent publications in this field. Implantation of the hydraulic artificial urinary sphincter is still the gold standard, particularly in severe cases. Alternatively, new techniques and other artificial materials are gaining favour, aiming at a large cohort of patients with less severe incontinence, which have been not treated or overtreated so far. Advances in both areas are covered within this review article in detail. Summary For treatment of incontinence following prostatectomy, a large variety of surgical techniques are readily available and have proven to be helpful tools in making patients' uncomfortable lives much easier. In addition, the wide armamentarium of artificial materials and techniques may help to choose the proper surgical technique for every patients' needs.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 64
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], INT BRAZ J UROL
[2]  
Cerqueira M, 2005, Actas Urol Esp, V29, P401
[3]   Polypropylene mesh tape for male sphincteric incontinence [J].
Cetinel, B ;
Demirkesen, O ;
Kural, AR ;
Onal, B ;
Alan, C .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2004, 38 (05) :396-400
[4]   The male perineal sling: Comparison of sling materials [J].
Dikranian, AH ;
Chang, JH ;
Rhee, EY ;
Aboseif, SR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 172 (02) :608-610
[5]   RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR IMPALPABLE PROSTATE-CANCER - THE JOHNS-HOPKINS EXPERIENCE WITH TUMORS FOUND ON TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION (STAGES T1A AND T1B) AND ON NEEDLE-BIOPSY (STAGE T1C) [J].
EPSTEIN, JI ;
WALSH, PC ;
BRENDLER, CB .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 152 (05) :1721-1729
[6]  
Fassi-Fehri H, 2004, PROG UROL, V14, P1171
[7]   The comparison of artificial urinary sphincter implantation and endourethral macroplastique injection for the treatment of postprostatectomy incontinence [J].
Imamoglu, MA ;
Tuygun, C ;
Bakirtas, H ;
Yigitbasi, O ;
Kiper, A .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2005, 47 (02) :209-213
[8]  
JENSEN OM, 1990, EUR J CANCER, V26, P1167
[9]  
JOHANSEN TE, 2005, TIDSSKR NOR LAEGEFOR, V16, P1658
[10]  
John H, 2004, J UROLOGY, V171, P1866, DOI 10.1097/01.ju.0000121413.62521.cc