Multiscale Seismic Vulnerability Assessment and Retrofit of Existing Masonry Buildings

被引:45
|
作者
Ferreira, Tiago Miguel [1 ]
Mendes, Nuno [1 ]
Silva, Rui [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minho, Inst Sci & Innovat Biosustainabil IB S, Dept Civil Engn, ISISE, P-4710057 Braga, Portugal
关键词
seismic vulnerability assessment; large-scale vulnerability analysis; numerical modelling; seismic retrofit; DAMAGE SCENARIOS; ELEMENT-ANALYSIS; LIMIT ANALYSIS; FACADE WALLS; EARTHQUAKE; BEHAVIOR; CONNECTIONS; MODEL; RISK; FAILURE;
D O I
10.3390/buildings9040091
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The growing concern about the protection of built heritage and the sustainability of urban areas has driven the reoccupation of existing masonry buildings, which, in the great majority of the cases, were not designed or constructed to withstand significant seismic forces. This fact, associated with territorial occupation often concentrated in areas with high seismic hazard, makes it essential to look at these buildings from the point of view of the assessment of their seismic vulnerability and retrofitting needs. However, to be effective and efficient, such an assessment must be founded on a solid knowledge of the existing methods and tools, as well as on the criteria that should underlie the selection of the most appropriate to use in each context and situation. Aimed at contributing to systematise that knowledge, this paper presents a comprehensive review of the most relevant vulnerability assessment methods applicable at different scales, as well as the most significant traditional and innovative seismic retrofitting solutions for existing masonry buildings.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Seismic vulnerability of existing RC buildings and influence of the decoupling of the effective masonry panels from the structural frames
    De Angelis, Fabio
    Cancellara, Donato
    MATERIALS, MECHANICAL ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURE, PTS 1-3, 2013, 268-270 : 646 - 655
  • [42] Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Portuguese Adobe Buildings
    Momin, Samar
    Lovon, Holger
    Silva, Vitor
    Ferreira, Tiago Miguel
    Vicente, Romeu
    BUILDINGS, 2021, 11 (05)
  • [43] Simple Seismic Assessment of Traditional Unreinforced Masonry Buildings
    Karantoni, F. V.
    Papadopoulos, M. L.
    Pantazopoulou, S. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE, 2016, 10 (08) : 1055 - 1077
  • [44] Theoretical and experimental study on an innovative seismic retrofit solution for old brick masonry buildings
    Shi, Sheng
    Du, Dongsheng
    Xu, Weizhi
    Wang, Shuguang
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2020, 225 (225)
  • [45] Experimental Study on Injected Anchors for the Seismic Retrofit of Historical Masonry Buildings
    Silveri, Francesca
    Riva, Paolo
    Profeta, Giacomo
    Poverello, Elena
    Algeri, Christiano
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE, 2016, 10 (2-3) : 182 - 203
  • [46] Effect of retrofit interventions on seismic fragility of Italian residential masonry buildings
    Follador, Veronica
    Carpanese, Pietro
    Dona, Marco
    da Porto, Francesca
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2023, 91
  • [47] Seismic vulnerability assessment and fragility analysis of pre-code masonry buildings in Portugal
    Vasco Bernardo
    Alfredo Campos Costa
    Paulo Candeias
    Aníbal Costa
    Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2022, 20 : 6229 - 6265
  • [48] Hemp-FRP for Seismic Retrofitting of Existing Masonry Buildings
    Formisano, Antonio
    Vaiano, Generoso
    Petrucci, Nicola, Jr.
    PROTECTION OF HISTORICAL CONSTRUCTIONS, PROHITECH 2021, 2022, 209 : 402 - 417
  • [49] A Review of Emerging Technologies for an Assessment of Safety and Seismic Vulnerability and Damage Detection of Existing Masonry Structures
    Stepinac, Mislav
    Gasparovic, Mateo
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (15):
  • [50] Seismic safety assessment of existing masonry infill structures in Nepal
    Chaulagain, Hemchandra
    Rodrigues, Hugo
    Spacone, Enrico
    Varum, Humberto
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING VIBRATION, 2016, 15 (02) : 251 - 268