Factors that influence career progression among postdoctoral clinical academics: a scoping review of the literature

被引:45
作者
Ranieri, Veronica [1 ,2 ]
Barratt, Helen [2 ]
Fulop, Naomi [3 ]
Rees, Geraint [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Sch Life & Med Sci, Acad Careers Off, London, England
[2] UCL, Dept Appl Hlth Res, London, England
[3] UCL, Dept Appl Hlth Res, Hlth Care Org & Management, London, England
[4] UCL, Fac Life Sci, London, England
[5] UCL, Dept Cognit Neurol, London, England
[6] UCL, Acad Careers Off, London, England
关键词
MINORITY FACULTY; SEX-DIFFERENCES; MEDICAL-SCHOOL; JUNIOR FACULTY; ROLE-MODELS; WOMEN; BARRIERS; SCIENTISTS; RETENTION; RECRUITMENT;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013523
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The future of academic medicine is uncertain. Concerns regarding the future availability of qualified and willing trainee clinical academics have been raised worldwide. Of significant concern is our failure to retain postdoctoral trainee clinical academics, who are likely to be our next generation of leaders in scientific discovery. Objectives: To review the literature about factors that may influence postdoctoral career progression in early career clinical academics. Design: This study employed a scoping review method. Three reviewers separately assessed whether the articles found fit the inclusion criteria. Data sources: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar (1991-2015). Article selection: The review encompassed a broad search of English language studies published anytime up to November 2015. All articles were eligible for inclusion, including research papers employing either quantitative or qualitative methods, as well as editorials and other summary articles. Data extraction: Data extracted from included publications were charted according to author(s), sample population, study design, key findings, country of origin and year of publication. Results: Our review identified 6 key influences: intrinsic motivation, work-life balance, inclusiveness, work environment, mentorship and availability of funding. It also detected significant gaps within the literature about these influences. Conclusions: Three key steps are proposed to help support postdoctoral trainee clinical academics. These focus on ensuring that researchers feel encouraged in their workplace, involved in collaborative dialogue with key stakeholders and able to access reliable information regarding their chosen career pathway. Finally, we highlight recommendations for future research.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]   Investigating the sustainability of careers in academic primary care in the United Kingdom [J].
Adams, Ann ;
Lester, Helen ;
Reeve, Joanne ;
Roberts, Jane ;
Wilson, Andrew .
PRIMARY HEALTH CARE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 15 (03) :331-335
[2]  
[Anonymous], CLIN CAR REV
[3]  
[Anonymous], WELLC TRUST CLIN CAR
[4]  
[Anonymous], ATH SWAN CHART
[5]  
[Anonymous], SUPP TOM LEAD TOD AC
[6]  
[Anonymous], ACAD PHYS SCI APR
[7]  
Arksey H., 2005, INT J SOC RES METHOD, V8, P19, DOI 10.1080/1364557032000119616
[8]   How to attract, retain and nurture young academic clinicians [J].
Aronson, Jeffrey K. .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 2011, 104 (01) :6-14
[9]   SELF-EFFICACY - TOWARD A UNIFYING THEORY OF BEHAVIORAL CHANGE [J].
BANDURA, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1977, 84 (02) :191-215
[10]   Education and debate - Resuscitating clinical research in the United Kingdom [J].
Bell, J .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 327 (7422) :1041-1043