Knowledge brokering in public health: A critical analysis of the results of a qualitative evaluation

被引:35
作者
Dagenais, Christian [1 ]
Laurendeau, Marie-Claire [2 ]
Briand-Lamarche, Melodie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montreal, Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Ctr Hlth, Montreal, PQ H3A 1A1, Canada
关键词
Knowledge brokering; Qualitative evaluation; Critical analysis; POLICY; EXCHANGE; ORGANIZATIONS; PROFESSIONALS; TRANSLATION; INFORMATION; FRAMEWORK; REFLECTIONS; SYSTEMS; NEED;
D O I
10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2015.07.003
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Empirical data on the processes underlying knowledge brokering (KB) interventions, including their determining factors and effects, remain scarce. Furthermore, these interventions are rarely built on explicit theoretical foundations, making their critical analysis difficult, even a posteriori. For these reasons, it appeared relevant to revisit the results of a qualitative evaluation undertaken in the province of Quebec in parallel with a Canada-wide randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluating various KB strategies in public health. This paper looks critically at the theoretical foundations of the KB interventions in light of two conceptual models: (1) the dissemination model underlying the KB interventions used in the Canadian trial and (2) a systemic KB model developed later. This critical analysis sheds light on the processes involved in KB interventions and the factors influencing their implementation and effects. The conclusions of the critical analysis are consistent with the systemic model, in which interpersonal contact is an essential condition for effective KB interventions. This analysis may advance knowledge in the field by enhancing our understanding of the role of knowledge brokers as essential mediators in KB processes and outcomes. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 17
页数:8
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   New evidence on instrumental, conceptual, and symbolic utilization of university research in government agencies [J].
Amara, N ;
Ouimet, M ;
Landry, R .
SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2004, 26 (01) :75-106
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1990, Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, DOI DOI 10.1002/NUR.4770140111
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, WHO KNOWL MAN STRAT
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2003, The theory and practice of knowledge brokering in Canada's health system
[5]   Effective implementation of research into practice: An overview of systematic reviews of the health literature [J].
Boaz A. ;
Baeza J. ;
Fraser A. .
BMC Research Notes, 4 (1)
[6]   Pathways to "evidence-informed" policy and practice: A framework for action [J].
Bowen, S ;
Zwi, AB .
PLOS MEDICINE, 2005, 2 (07) :600-605
[7]  
Campbell Danielle M, 2009, Aust New Zealand Health Policy, V6, P21, DOI 10.1186/1743-8462-6-21
[8]   The strength of strong ties: A model of contact-making in policy networks with evidence from US health politics [J].
Carpenter, D ;
Esterling, K ;
Lazer, D .
RATIONALITY AND SOCIETY, 2003, 15 (04) :411-440
[9]   Can scientists and policy makers work together? [J].
Choi, BCK ;
Pang, T ;
Lin, V ;
Puska, P ;
Sherman, G ;
Goddard, M ;
Ackland, MJ ;
Sainsbury, P ;
Stachenko, S ;
Morrison, H ;
Clottey, C .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2005, 59 (08) :632-637
[10]  
Cinq-Mars M., 2010, CARNETSSYNTHESE