COMPARING DXA AND AIR DISPLACEMENT PLETHYSMOGRAPHY TO ASSESS BODY COMPOSITION OF MALE COLLEGIATE HOCKEY PLAYERS

被引:11
作者
Delisle-Houde, Patrick [1 ]
Reid, Ryan E. R. [1 ]
Insogna, Jessica A. [1 ]
Prokop, Neal W. [1 ]
Buchan, Tayler A. [1 ]
Fontaine, Shawn L. [1 ]
Andersen, Ross E. [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Kinesiol & Phys Educ, Hlth & Fitness Promot Lab, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
body fat; fat-free mass; field validity; PERFORMANCE; STRENGTH; PROFILE;
D O I
10.1519/JSC.0000000000001863
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Accurate assessment of body composition is an important consideration for athletes because it is a health/performance variable. However, little is known about the variability in values obtained across different assessment methods for specific athlete populations. The purpose of this study was to compare 2 common laboratory methods that assess body composition: air displacement plethysmography (BOD POD) and dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Twenty-ninemale collegiate hockey players, (Age = 24.07 +/- 1.49, BMI = 26.5 +/- 2.74) participated in this study. All participants underwent back-to-back BOD POD and DXA evaluations. Paired t-tests and Bland-Altman analyses were performed to compare differences in fat mass, fat percentage, and fat-free mass between methods. Average fat percentage reported by the DXA and BOD POD was 15.34 +/- 3.53 and 11.66 +/- 4.82 respectively, resulting in a bias score of 3.78 +/- 2.33 kg (t(28) = 8.71, p <= 0.001). Average fat mass reported by the DXA and BOD POD was 13.42 +/- 3.59 and 10.15 +/- 4.54 kg respectively, resulting in a bias score of 3.27 +/- 1.92 kg (t(28) = 9.18, p <= 0.001). Average fat-free mass reported by the DXA and BOD POD was 73.31 +/- 5.30 and 76.25 +/- 5.74 kg respectively, resulting in a bias score of -2.93 +/- 2.06 kg (t(28) = -7.66, p <= 0.001). Our findings can help make more insightful comparisons between studies that use different body composition methodologies among athletic populations.
引用
收藏
页码:474 / 478
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Current Status of Body Composition Assessment in Sport Review and Position Statement on Behalf of the Ad Hoc Research Working Group on Body Composition Health and Performance, Under the Auspices of the I.O.C. Medical Commission [J].
Ackland, Timothy R. ;
Lohman, Timothy G. ;
Sundgot-Borgen, Jorunn ;
Maughan, Ronald J. ;
Meyer, Nanna L. ;
Stewart, Arthur D. ;
Mueller, Wolfram .
SPORTS MEDICINE, 2012, 42 (03) :227-249
[2]   Comparison of Bod Pod® and DXA in female collegiate athletes [J].
Ballard, TP ;
Fafara, L ;
Vukovich, MD .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2004, 36 (04) :731-735
[3]   The accuracy and precision of DXA for assessing body composition in team sport athletes [J].
Bilsborough, Johann Christopher ;
Greenway, Kate ;
Opar, David ;
Livingstone, Steuart ;
Cordy, Justin ;
Coutts, Aaron James .
JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 2014, 32 (19) :1821-1828
[4]  
CDC, 2011, BOD COMP PROC MAN 3
[5]  
Clark MA., 2010, NASM's Essentials of Sports Performance Training
[6]  
DEMPSTER P, 1995, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V27, P1692
[7]   Strength and conditioning practices of National Hockey League strength and conditioning coaches [J].
Ebben, WP ;
Carroll, RM ;
Simenz, CJ .
JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2004, 18 (04) :889-897
[8]   Body Composition and Endocrine Profile of Male Olympic Athletes Striving for Leanness [J].
Hagmar, Magnus ;
Berglund, Bo ;
Brismar, Kerstin ;
Hirschberg, Angelica Linden .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF SPORT MEDICINE, 2013, 23 (03) :197-201
[9]  
Heyward V.H., 2004, Applied Body Composition Assessment, V2nd ed., P27
[10]   Preliminary evidence that DEXA provides an accurate assessment of body composition [J].
Kohrt, WM .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 84 (01) :372-377