Independent Processing of Stimulus-Stimulus and Stimulus-Response Conflicts

被引:26
作者
Li, Qi [1 ]
Nan, Weizhi [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Kai [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Xun [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Psychol, Key Lab Behav Sci, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
PLOS ONE | 2014年 / 9卷 / 02期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 北京市自然科学基金;
关键词
COGNITIVE CONTROL MECHANISMS; DIMENSIONAL OVERLAP; ATTENTIONAL CONTROL; HUMAN BRAIN; STROOP-LIKE; SIMON; COMPATIBILITY; MODEL; TASK; INTERFERENCE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0089249
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The dimensional overlap (DO) model proposes distinct mechanisms for stimulus-stimulus (S-S) and stimulus-response (S-R) conflict effects. Many studies have examined the independence of S-S and S-R conflict effects in the color-word Stroop and Simon tasks. However, confounds exist between the distinction of DO (i.e., S-S dimensional overlap compared with S-R dimensional overlap) and the distinction of stimulus attributes (e.g., color compared with spatial location; semantic compared with nonsemantic information), which may hinder interpretation of the independence of S-S and S-R conflicts. A spatial Stroop (word) task and a spatial Stroop (arrow) task were combined with a Simon task in Experiments 1 and 2, respectively to eliminate these confounds of stimulus attributes. The results showed that S-S and S-R conflicts affected performance additively. There was no significant correlation across participants. These findings lend further support to independent processing of S-S and S-R conflicts as it is outlined in the taxonomy of DO.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Direct Comparison of Spatial Attention and Stimulus-Response Compatibility between Mice and Humans
    Schnabel, Ulf H.
    Van der Bijl, Tobias
    Roelfsema, Pieter R.
    Lorteije, Jeannette A. M.
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 33 (05) : 771 - 783
  • [42] The error-related negativity associated with different strength of stimulus-response interference
    Masaki, Hiroaki
    Murphy, Timothy I.
    Desjardins, James A.
    Segalowitz, Sidney J.
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2012, 123 (04) : 689 - 699
  • [43] Stimulus-Response Compatibility Effect in the Near-Far Dimension: A Developmental Study
    Richez, Aurelien
    Olivier, Gerard
    Coello, Yann
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 7
  • [44] Study-test congruence of response levels in item stimulus-response priming
    Gomes, Carlos A.
    Mayes, Andrew
    MEMORY & COGNITION, 2020, 48 (05) : 839 - 855
  • [45] Stimulus and response conflict processing during perceptual decision making
    Wendelken, Carter
    Ditterich, Jochen
    Bunge, Silvia A.
    Carter, Cameron S.
    COGNITIVE AFFECTIVE & BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2009, 9 (04) : 434 - 447
  • [46] An Investigation of Spatial Stimulus-Response Compatibility Effects Based on German Particles
    Ansorge, Ulrich
    Engel, Florian
    Siener, Anni
    Strini, Tamara
    EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 65 (04) : 201 - 209
  • [47] Influence of stimulus-response assignment on the joint-action correspondence effect
    Lam, Melanie Y.
    Chua, Romeo
    PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2010, 74 (05): : 476 - 480
  • [48] Effects of stimulus-response compatibility on inhibitory processes in Parkinson's disease
    Beste, Christian
    Dziobek, Isabel
    Hielscher, Horst
    Willemssen, Rita
    Falkenstein, Michael
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2009, 29 (04) : 855 - 860
  • [49] Context-specific interference on reversal learning of a stimulus-response habit
    McDonald, RJ
    King, AL
    Hong, NS
    BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2001, 121 (1-2) : 149 - 165
  • [50] Spatial stimulus-response compatibility and affordance effects are not ruled by the same mechanisms
    Ambrosecchia, Marianna
    Marino, Barbara F. M.
    Gawryszewski, Luiz G.
    Riggio, Lucia
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 9