Independent Processing of Stimulus-Stimulus and Stimulus-Response Conflicts

被引:26
|
作者
Li, Qi [1 ]
Nan, Weizhi [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Kai [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Xun [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Psychol, Key Lab Behav Sci, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
PLOS ONE | 2014年 / 9卷 / 02期
基金
北京市自然科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
COGNITIVE CONTROL MECHANISMS; DIMENSIONAL OVERLAP; ATTENTIONAL CONTROL; HUMAN BRAIN; STROOP-LIKE; SIMON; COMPATIBILITY; MODEL; TASK; INTERFERENCE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0089249
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The dimensional overlap (DO) model proposes distinct mechanisms for stimulus-stimulus (S-S) and stimulus-response (S-R) conflict effects. Many studies have examined the independence of S-S and S-R conflict effects in the color-word Stroop and Simon tasks. However, confounds exist between the distinction of DO (i.e., S-S dimensional overlap compared with S-R dimensional overlap) and the distinction of stimulus attributes (e.g., color compared with spatial location; semantic compared with nonsemantic information), which may hinder interpretation of the independence of S-S and S-R conflicts. A spatial Stroop (word) task and a spatial Stroop (arrow) task were combined with a Simon task in Experiments 1 and 2, respectively to eliminate these confounds of stimulus attributes. The results showed that S-S and S-R conflicts affected performance additively. There was no significant correlation across participants. These findings lend further support to independent processing of S-S and S-R conflicts as it is outlined in the taxonomy of DO.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Stimulus-response versus stimulus-stimulus-response learning in cerebellar patients
    Richter, S
    Matthies, K
    Ohde, T
    Dimitrova, A
    Gizewski, E
    Beck, A
    Aurich, V
    Timmann, D
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2004, 158 (04) : 438 - 449
  • [22] Stimulus-response versus stimulus-stimulus-response learning in cerebellar patients
    S. Richter
    K. Matthies
    T. Ohde
    A. Dimitrova
    E. Gizewski
    A. Beck
    V. Aurich
    D. Timmann
    Experimental Brain Research, 2004, 158 : 438 - 449
  • [23] Context modulates early stimulus processing when resolving stimulus-response conflict
    Scerif, G
    Worden, MS
    Davidson, M
    Seiger, L
    Casey, BJ
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2006, 18 (05) : 781 - 792
  • [24] Dissociating stimulus-stimulus and response-response effects in the Stroop task
    Schmidt, JR
    Cheesman, J
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE EXPERIMENTALE, 2005, 59 (02): : 132 - 138
  • [25] The stimulus-response relation
    Mursell, JL
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1922, 29 (02) : 146 - 162
  • [26] The stimulus-response crisis
    Wilford, Robyn
    Ardila-Cifuentes, Juan
    Baggs, Edward
    Anderson, Michael L.
    BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 2022, 45
  • [27] Stimulus-response compatibility as a function of stimulus code and response modality
    Wang, HF
    Proctor, RW
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1996, 22 (05) : 1201 - 1217
  • [28] Stimulus modality and stimulus-response compatibility in absolute identification
    Lacouture, Y
    Lacerte, D
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE EXPERIMENTALE, 1997, 51 (02): : 165 - 170
  • [29] ENCODING, STIMULUS-RESPONSE COMPATIBILITY, AND STAGES OF PROCESSING
    STANOVICH, KE
    PACHELLA, RG
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1977, 3 (03) : 411 - 421
  • [30] BASIC AND TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH ON STIMULUS-STIMULUS RELATIONS
    Dougher, Michael
    Twohig, Michael P.
    Madden, Gregory J.
    JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 2014, 101 (01) : 1 - 9