Postoperative Functional Management Contributes to Anal Functional Recovery in Patients With Low Rectal Cancer After Robotic Total Intersphincteric Resection

被引:4
作者
Xiaosong, Wang [1 ]
Hongchang, Liu [1 ]
Min, Deng [2 ]
Lijuan, Xie [2 ]
Chuan, Li [1 ]
Peiwu, Yu [1 ]
Bo, Tang [1 ]
机构
[1] Army Med Univ, Southwest Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[2] Army Med Univ, Southwest Hosp, Dept Rehabil, Chongqing, Peoples R China
关键词
intersphincteric resection (ISR); low rectal cancer; anal function; biofeedback; robotic; FECAL INCONTINENCE; ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2020.01373
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose:To evaluate the effectiveness of the comprehensive post-operative management including low-frequency endo-anal electrical stimulation and daily suppository usage on post-operative anal functional recovery for low rectal cancer patients who underwent robotic total intersphincteric resection (ISR). Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed on 42 low rectal cancer patients who underwent robotic total ISR, of which 23 patients received comprehensive post-operative management, including biofeedback low-frequency endo-anal electrical stimulation and daily suppository usage (management group). Wexner score and anorectal manometric values, including resting pressure (RP), maximum squeeze pressure (MSP), initial perceived volume (IPV), and maximum tolerated volume (MTV), were assessed and compared. Results:A total of 42 low rectal cancer patients were included in our study. The RP at 6 months after ISR (40.95 +/- 6.95 mmHg vs. 33.29 +/- 5.40 mmHg,p= 0.002) and MSP at 3 and 6 months after ISR (72.05 +/- 10.16 mmHg vs. 69.05 +/- 8.67 mmHg,p= 0.031; 91.57 +/- 15.47 mmHg vs. 84.05 +/- 12.94 mmHg,p= 0.039, respectively) were significantly higher in the management group. The median IPV at 1 and 3 months after ISR (17.81 +/- 3.61 ml vs. 15.43 +/- 5.08 ml,p= 0.038; 20.19 +/- 4.35 ml vs. 17.67 +/- 5.16 ml,p= 0.044, respectively) and MTV at 3 months after ISR (83.71 +/- 5.44 ml vs. 76.10 +/- 8.42 ml,p= 0.012) were significantly higher in the management group. Wexner scores at 1 and 3 months after closure of stoma (COS) in the management group were significantly lower (11.3 +/- 2.9 vs. 13.4 +/- 3.0,p= 0.041; 8.9 +/- 2.0 vs. 10.6 +/- 2.4,p= 0.036, respectively). Conclusions:Comprehensive post-operative management could accelerate the recovery of sphincteric function and anal sensitivity after robotic total ISR and could also contribute to treatment of fecal incontinence followed by COS.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer: a systematic review [J].
Akagi, Yoshito ;
Kinugasa, Tetsushi ;
Shirouzu, Kazuo .
SURGERY TODAY, 2013, 43 (08) :838-847
[2]   Fecal incontinence [J].
Bharucha, AE .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 124 (06) :1672-1685
[3]   Patient-Controlled Biofeedback Device for the Treatment of Fecal Incontinence: A Pilot Study [J].
Damin, Daniel C. ;
Hommerding, Felipe ;
Schirmer, Delber ;
Sanches, Paulo R. S. ;
Silva Junior, Danton P. ;
Mueller, Andre F. ;
Thome, Paulo R. O. .
APPLIED PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY AND BIOFEEDBACK, 2017, 42 (02) :133-137
[4]   Quality of life in rectal cancer patients -: A four-year prospective study [J].
Engel, J ;
Kerr, J ;
Schlesinger-Raab, A ;
Eckel, R ;
Sauer, H ;
Hölzel, D .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2003, 238 (02) :203-213
[5]   The effects of low-frequency endo-anal electrical stimulation on faecal incontinence: a prospective study [J].
Healy, Ciaran F. ;
Brannigan, Ann E. ;
Connolly, Elizabeth M. ;
Eng, Molly ;
O'Sullivan, Martin J. ;
McNamara, Deborah A. ;
Cusack, Cinny ;
Deasy, Joseph M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2006, 21 (08) :802-806
[6]   Analysis of Clinical Factors Associated with Anal Function after Intersphincteric Resection for Very Low Rectal Cancer [J].
Ito, Masaaki ;
Saito, Norio ;
Sugito, Masanori ;
Kobayashi, Akihiro ;
Nishizawa, Yusuke ;
Tsunoda, Yoshiyuki .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2009, 52 (01) :64-70
[7]   Clinical benefit of high resolution anorectal manometry for the evaluation of anal function after intersphincteric resection [J].
Kitaguchi, D. ;
Nishizawa, Y. ;
Sasaki, T. ;
Tsukada, Y. ;
Ito, M. .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2019, 21 (03) :335-341
[8]   Current practice of continence advisors in managing faecal incontinence in the United Kingdom: results of an online survey [J].
Leo, C. A. ;
Maeda, Y. ;
Collins, B. ;
Thomas, G. P. ;
Hodgkinson, J. D. ;
Murphy, J. ;
Vaizey, C. J. .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2017, 19 (09) :O339-O344
[9]   Long-Term Functional and Oncological Outcomes Following Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancers [J].
Mahalingam S. ;
Seshadri R.A. ;
Veeraiah S. .
Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2017, 8 (4) :457-461
[10]  
MARCIO J, 1993, DIS COLON RECTUM, V36, P77