Investigation of process performance and fouling mechanisms in micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration of nickel-contaminated waters

被引:53
作者
Danis, Ummuhan [1 ]
Aydiner, Coskun [2 ]
机构
[1] Ataturk Univ, Fac Med, Dept Environm Engn, TR-25240 Erzurum, Turkey
[2] Gebze Inst Technol, Dept Environm Engn, TR-41400 Kocaeli, Turkey
关键词
Micellar-enhanced; Ultrafiltration; Nickel; Treatment; Modeling; Fouling; ACTIVATED CARBON; AQUEOUS-SOLUTION; REMOVAL; SURFACTANT; SYSTEM; ADSORPTION; SEPARATION; METALS; NI(II); IONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.05.098
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Nickel removal from aqueous solution by micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration (MEUF) with relatively low transmembrane pressures was investigated at varying conditions of sodium lauryl ether sulfate (SLES) and nickel concentrations, transmembrane pressure and sodium chloride content. Process employed in continuous filtration mode, could be operated within a short time of 30 min presenting high rejection of nickel and SLES at high transient fluxes. Under the effect of increasing transmembrane pressure, the rejection of nickel and SLES increased, but the transient flux decreased. The existence of salt caused to decrease both rejections and flux. Nickel rejection, SLES rejection and flux were establihed as 98.6%, 75.7% and 0.304 m(3)/m(2) h, respectively, for the conditions of surfactant to metal (SIM) ratio of 10 (SLES = 2 mM), transmembrane pressure of 250 kPa without NaCl content at the end of 90-min operation time. The analyses related to the membrane fouling were carried out using adsorptive fouling models. It has been determined that, the fouling occurs as a dynamic function of various process conditions studied, and depends strongly on mechanisms controlled by the formation of gel layer and its bridging over the pore entrances simultaneously together with partial constriction of membrane pores by surfactant adsorption. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:577 / 587
页数:11
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] AGUIRRE JL, 2006, DESALINATION, V200, P272
  • [2] Micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration of gold(III) with nonionic surfactant
    Akita, S
    Yang, L
    Takeuchi, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1997, 133 (02) : 189 - 194
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2003, D304989 ASTM
  • [4] Dynamic micellar enhanced ultrafiltration:: use of anionic (SDS)-nonionic(NPE) system to remove Cr3+ at low surfactant concentration
    Aoudia, M
    Allal, N
    Djennet, A
    Toumi, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2003, 217 (1-2) : 181 - 192
  • [5] Separation of an anionic surfactant by nanofiltration
    Archer, AC
    Mendes, AM
    Boaventura, RAR
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 33 (16) : 2758 - 2764
  • [6] *AWWA DES REUS COM, 1989, J AWWA, V81, P30
  • [7] Nickel removal from waters using surfactant-enhanced hybrid PAC/MF process. I. The influence of system-component variables
    Aydiner, Coskun
    Bayramoglu, Mahmut
    Kara, Serdar
    Keskinler, Bulent
    Ince, Orhan
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2006, 45 (11) : 3926 - 3933
  • [8] Removal characteristics of anionic metals by micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration
    Baek, K
    Kim, BK
    Cho, HJ
    Yang, JW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2003, 99 (03) : 303 - 311
  • [9] Cationic starch-enhanced ultrafiltration for Cr(VI) removal
    Baek, Kitae
    Yang, Jung-Seok
    Kwon, Tae-Soon
    Yang, Ji-Won
    [J]. DESALINATION, 2007, 206 (1-3) : 245 - 250
  • [10] Removal of bivalent heavy metal mixtures from water by Saccharomyces cerevisiae using crossflow microfiltration
    Bayhan, YK
    Keskinler, B
    Cakici, A
    Levent, M
    Akay, G
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2001, 35 (09) : 2191 - 2200