Knowledge brokerage - potential for increased capacities and shared power in impact assessment

被引:79
作者
Partidario, Maria Rosario [1 ]
Sheate, William R. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Inst Super Tecn, P-1049001 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Ctr Environm Policy, London SW7 2AZ, England
[3] Collingwood Environm Planning Ltd, Chandlery, London SE1 7QY, England
关键词
SEA; Sustainability; Knowledge; Brokerage; Participation; Power; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT; DECISION-MAKING; MOUNTAIN AREAS; ACCOUNTABILITY; PARTICIPATION; REFLECTIONS; CHALLENGES; GOVERNANCE; LEGITIMACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.eiar.2012.02.002
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Constructive and collaborative planning theory has exposed the perceived limitations of public participation in impact assessment. At strategic levels of assessment the established norm can be misleading and practice is illusive. For example, debates on SEA effectiveness recognize insufficiencies, but are often based on questionable premises. The authors of this paper argue that public participation in strategic assessment requires new forms of information and engagement, consistent with the complexity of the issues at these levels and that strategic assessments can act as knowledge brokerage instruments with the potential to generate more participative environments and attitudes. The paper explores barriers and limitations, as well as the role of knowledge brokerage in stimulating the engagement of the public, through learning-oriented processes and responsibility sharing in more participative models of governance. The paper concludes with a discussion on building and inter-change of knowledge, towards creative solutions to identified problems, stimulating learning processes, largely beyond simple information transfer mechanisms through consultative processes. The paper argues fundamentally for the need to conceive strategic assessments as learning platforms and design knowledge brokerage opportunities explicitly as a means to enhance learning processes and power sharing in IA. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 36
页数:11
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], IMPACT ASSESS PROJEC, DOI DOI 10.3152/146155109X454294
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Environ. Policy Gov, DOI [10.1002/eet.509, DOI 10.1002/EET.509]
[3]   Systems thinking, knowledge and action: towards better models and methods [J].
Best, Allan ;
Holmes, Bev .
EVIDENCE & POLICY, 2010, 6 (02) :145-159
[4]   What kinds of knowledge, knowing and learning are required for addressing resource dilemmas?: a theoretical overview [J].
Blackmore, Chris .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2007, 10 (06) :512-525
[5]   Transforming policy through local wisdom [J].
Blackwell, A ;
Colmenar, R .
FUTURES, 1999, 31 (05) :487-497
[7]  
Bloom B.S., 1956, HDB 1 COGNITIVE DOMA
[8]  
Canadian Health Services Research Foundation, 2003, THEOR PRACT KNOWL BR
[9]   The role and functioning of environmental assessment: Theoretical reflections upon an empirical investigation of causation [J].
Cashmore, Matthew ;
Bond, Alan ;
Cobb, Dick .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2008, 88 (04) :1233-1248
[10]  
Clark G., 2005, New directions for knowledge transfer and knowledge brokerage in Scotland Scottish Executive Social Research