The Impact of Scientific Journals of Communication: Comparing Google Scholar Metrics, Web of Science and Scopus

被引:75
作者
Delgado Lopez-Cozar, Emilio [1 ]
Repiso Caballero, Rafael [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Granada, Dept Commun & Informat, Fac Commun & Lib Sci, Granada, Spain
[2] ESCO ESNA, Dept Social Sci, Sch Commun, Granada, Spain
关键词
Communication; Google Scholar; Scopus; Web of Science; citations analysis; bibliometrics; h index; ranking; H-INDEX; INDICATORS; CITATIONS;
D O I
10.3916/C41-2013-04
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Google Scholar Metrics' launch in April 2012, a new bibliometric tool for the evaluation of scientific journals by means of citation counting, has ended with the duopoly exerted by the Web of Science and Scopus databases. This paper aims at comparing the coverage of these three databases and the similarity their journal rankings may have. We selected a sample of journals from the field of Communication Studies indexed in the three databases. Data was recollected on 17-20 November, 2012. 277 journals were identified to which we calculated their h-index and ranked them according to such indicator. Then, we analyzed the correlation between the rankings generated. Google Scholar Metrics dobles the coverage of the other databases, reducing the bias toward English language both; web of Science and Scopus have. Google Scholar Metrics shows higher h-index values (an average 47% higher than Scopus and 40% higher than Web of Science), allowing to better rank journals. We conclude that Google Scholar Metrics is a tool capable of identifying the main journals in Communication Studies offering results as reliable and valid as the ones Web of Science and Scopus show.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 52
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields [J].
Alonso, S. ;
Cabrerizo, F. J. ;
Herrera-Viedma, E. ;
Herrera, F. .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2009, 3 (04) :273-289
[2]  
Archambault E., 2004, USE BIBLIOMETRICS SO
[3]  
Bakkalbasi Nisa, 2006, Biomed Digit Libr, V3, P7, DOI 10.1186/1742-5581-3-7
[4]   Which h-index? - A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar [J].
Bar-Ilan, Judit .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2008, 74 (02) :257-271
[6]   A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures [J].
Bollen, Johan ;
Van de Sompel, Herbert ;
Hagberg, Aric ;
Chute, Ryan .
PLOS ONE, 2009, 4 (06)
[7]  
Braun T, 2005, SCIENTIST, V19, P8
[8]  
CABEZAS-CLAVIJO A., MED INTENSI IN PRESS
[9]  
Cabezas-Clavijo A., 2012, EC3 WORKING PAPERS
[10]  
CABEZAS-CLAVIJO A., 2012, 3 EC3