Intrauterine devices and adolescents

被引:27
作者
Gold, Melanie A. [1 ,2 ]
Johnson, Lisa M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Div Adolescent Med, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Div Student Affairs, Student Hlth Serv, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Dept Publ Hlth, Nassau, NP, Bahamas
关键词
adolescents; expulsion; infertility; intrauterine contraception; intrauterine device; pelvic inflammatory disease; pregnancy prevention;
D O I
10.1097/GCO.0b013e32830a98f8
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Purpose of review The purpose of this review is to inform the reader of new information published on intrauterine devices (IUDs) and adolescents. Recent findings There are few studies on the use of IUDs in adolescents. The article reviews topics related to IUD use such as adolescents' knowledge of and attitudes toward IUDs, mechanism of action of copper-releasing and levonorgestrel-releasing IUDs, benefits of using IUDs with adolescents, safety, side effects, as well as noncontraceptive benefits such as management of menstrual disorders and endometriosis using IUDs. Summary IUDs are a safe and effective long-term contraceptive method with no increase in risk of pelvic inflammatory disease, tubal infertility or ectopic pregnancies. IUDs are underutilized in the United States, especially by adolescents. Because adolescents contribute disproportionately to the epidemic of unintended pregnancy, lUDs should be considered as a first-line contraceptive choice regardless of parity. The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG IUS) is a particularly good choice for adolescents because of associated noncontraceptive benefits such as decreased menstrual bleeding, dysmenorrhea and pain associated with endometriosis. There is a clear need for further studies in the use of the IUD among adolescents.
引用
收藏
页码:464 / 469
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Performance of copper intrauterine devices when inserted after an expulsion
    Bahamondes, L
    Diaz, J
    Marchi, NM
    Petta, CA
    Cristofoletti, MD
    Gomez, G
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1995, 10 (11) : 2917 - 2918
  • [22] Safety of intrauterine devices among women with HIV: a systematic review
    Tepper, Naomi K.
    Curtis, Kathryn M.
    Nanda, Kavita
    Jamieson, Denise J.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2016, 94 (06) : 713 - 724
  • [24] Bacteriological cultures of removed intrauterine devices and pelvic inflammatory disease
    Tsanadis, G
    Kalantaridou, SN
    Kaponis, A
    Paraskevaidis, E
    Zikopoulos, K
    Gesouli, E
    Dalkalitsis, N
    Korkontzelos, I
    Mouzakioti, E
    CONTRACEPTION, 2002, 65 (05) : 339 - 342
  • [25] Postabortion and Postpartum Intrauterine Device Provision for Adolescents and Young Adults
    Peterson, Sarah F.
    Goldthwaite, Lisa M.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC AND ADOLESCENT GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 32 (05) : S30 - S35
  • [26] The impact of intrauterine devices on subsequent fertility
    Skjeldestad, Finn E.
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 20 (03) : 275 - 280
  • [27] Worldwide use of intrauterine devices for contraception
    d'Arcangues, Catherine
    CONTRACEPTION, 2007, 75 (06) : S2 - S7
  • [28] Hysteroscopic removal of intrauterine devices in pregnancy
    Sanders, Ari P.
    Sanders, Barry
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2018, 110 (07) : 1408 - 1409
  • [29] Pain and ease of insertion of three different intrauterine devices in Brazilian adolescents: A participant-blinded randomized trial
    Anjos, Fabiana C. Q. S.
    Marcelino, Ana C.
    Espejo-Arce, Ximena
    Pereira, Paula da C.
    Barbosa, Priscila F.
    Juliato, Cassia T.
    Bahamondes, Luis
    CONTRACEPTION, 2023, 122
  • [30] A minimalist technique for insertion of intrauterine devices
    Goldstuck, Norman David
    HEALTHCARE IN LOW-RESOURCE SETTINGS, 2015, 3 (01):