Comparison of minimally invasive surgery for non-flail chest rib fractures: a prospective cohort study

被引:13
|
作者
Li, Yang [1 ]
Gao, Erji [1 ]
Yang, Yi [1 ]
Gao, Zongli [1 ]
He, Weiwei [1 ]
Zhao, Yonghong [1 ]
Wu, Weiming [1 ]
Zhao, Tiancheng [1 ]
Guo, Xiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Affiliated Peoples Hosp 6, Dept Thorac Surg, Shanghai 200000, Peoples R China
关键词
Non-flail chest rib fractures; minimally invasive surgery (MIS); rapid recovery; pulmonary function; pain index;
D O I
10.21037/jtd-19-2586
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: To evaluate therapeutic efficacy of minimally invasive and small incision surgery [minimally invasive surgery (MIS)] in patients with non-flail chest rib fractures through a prospective cohort study. Methods: This study included 98 patients with non-flail chest rib fractures (>= 3 displaced fractures) and 66 patients undergoing MIS served as the experimental group and 32 patients receiving conservative treatment served as the matched control group. Pain index and indicators of pulmonary function [vital capacity (VC); forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1); peak expiratory flow (PEF)] for the two groups were assessed and compared at the time of admission and before discharge. In addition, duration of pain, time required for the patient to regain the ability to perform daily self-care, mental labor, and moderate-to-severe physical labor, and duration of chest discomfort were measured during long-term follow-up and compared between the two groups. Results: There were also no significant differences (P>0.05) in pain index (8 vs. 8) or indicators of pulmonary function (VC: 31.0% vs. 26.5%; FEV1: 29.9% vs. 26.7%; PEF: 15.2% vs. 12.0%) were found between the MIS and conservative treatment groups at the time of admission; while pain index (3 vs. 6), VC (42.1% vs. 35.3%), and FEV1 (44.2% vs. 35.9%) were significantly different between the two groups (P<0.05) but not in PEF (21.2% vs. 19.6%) before discharge. Long-term follow-up showed that duration of pain, time required for the patient to regain the ability to engage in daily self-care, mental labor, and moderate-to-severe physical labor, and duration of chest discomfort in the MIS group were significantly more improved than in the conservative treatment group (P<0.05). Conclusions: MIS was a simple and safe treatment that significantly relieved chest pain and rapidly restored pulmonary function and improved the long-term quality of life of patients with non-flail chest rib fractures of >= 3 ribs with displacement.
引用
收藏
页码:3706 / 3714
页数:9
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] Surgical treatment ofpatients with severe non-flail chest rib fractures
    Jian-Peng Zhang
    Lin Sun
    Wei-Qiang Li
    Yan-Yu Wang
    Xin-Zhen Li
    Yang Liu
    World Journal of Clinical Cases, 2019, (22) : 3718 - 3727
  • [2] Surgical treatment of patients with severe non-flail chest rib fractures
    Zhang, Jian-Peng
    Sun, Lin
    Li, Wei-Qiang
    Wang, Yan-Yu
    Li, Xin-Zhen
    Liu, Yang
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2019, 7 (22) : 3718 - 3727
  • [3] The evaluation of pulmonary function after rib fixation for multiple rib fractures and flail chest: a retrospective study and systematic review of the current evidence
    Jesse Peek
    Reinier Bart Beks
    Valerie Kremo
    Nicole van Veelen
    Alfred Leiser
    Roderick Marijn Houwert
    Björn-Christian Link
    Matthias Knobe
    Reto Hansjörg Babst
    Frank Joseph Paulus Beeres
    European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, 2021, 47 : 1105 - 1114
  • [4] The evaluation of pulmonary function after rib fixation for multiple rib fractures and flail chest: a retrospective study and systematic review of the current evidence
    Peek, Jesse
    Beks, Reinier Bart
    Kremo, Valerie
    van Veelen, Nicole
    Leiser, Alfred
    Houwert, Roderick Marijn
    Link, Bjorn-Christian
    Knobe, Matthias
    Babst, Reto Hansjorg
    Beeres, Frank Joseph Paulus
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2021, 47 (04) : 1105 - 1114