Colorectal cancer incidence on the General Practice Research Database

被引:8
作者
Charlton, Rachel [1 ]
Snowball, Julia [1 ]
Bloomfield, Katherine [1 ,2 ]
de Vries, Corinne [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bath, Dept Pharm & Pharmacol, Bath BA2 7AY, Avon, England
[2] Univ Auckland, Dept Geriatr Med, Auckland 1, New Zealand
关键词
colorectal neoplasms; colorectal cancer; incidence; GPRD; case validation; RISK; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1002/pds.3236
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Purpose The General Practice Research Database (GPRD) contains longitudinal patient medical records collected within UK primary care. This study aimed to identify incident cases of colorectal cancer on the GPRD and to compare incidence rates for 2007 with those reported by the UK cancer registries. Methods Algorithms were created to identify incident cases of colorectal cancer on the GPRD and cases were required to have additional medical codes to support the diagnosis. Age-specific and sex-specific incidence rates for 2007 were calculated using the GPRD data and compared with those reported by the cancer registries. Results Trends in colorectal cancer by age and sex were similar for the two data sources; however, the incidence of colorectal cancer on the GPRD was lower than that of the registries, particularly when supporting evidence was required: 57.0 compared with 70.2 per 100?000 per year for men and 42.0 compared with 56.6 per 100?000 per year for women. Inclusion of cases without supporting evidence still resulted in lower rates but increased the GPRD rates to 63.7 and 48.4 for men and women, respectively. The largest discrepancy was observed in the older age groups. Conclusion Colorectal cancer rates on the GPRD were lower than those reported by UK cancer registries, especially when requiring supporting evidence in addition to a diagnosis code. It appears that the requirement of supporting evidence on the GPRD for colorectal cancer identification may result in some true cases being excluded, particularly in the very elderly. Copyright (c) 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:775 / 783
页数:9
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], CANC STAT REG REG CA
[2]  
Cancer Research UK, 2010, BOW COL CANC UK INC
[3]   Cancer incidence in The Health Improvement Network [J].
Haynes, Kevin ;
Forde, Kimberly A. ;
Schinnar, Rita ;
Wong, Patricia ;
Strom, Brian L. ;
Lewis, James D. .
PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2009, 18 (08) :730-736
[4]   The relationship between time since registration and measured incidence rates in the General Practice Research Database [J].
Lewis, JD ;
Bilker, WB ;
Weinstein, RB ;
Strom, BL .
PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2005, 14 (07) :443-451
[5]   Association between acetaminophen or nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory drugs and risk of developing ovarian, breast, or colon cancer [J].
Meier, CR ;
Schmitz, S ;
Jick, H .
PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2002, 22 (03) :303-309
[6]  
MHRA, 2010, GEN PRACT RES DAT
[7]   Reduced risk of colorectal cancer among long-term users of aspirin and nonaspirin nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs [J].
Rodríguez, LAG ;
Huerta-Alvarez, C .
EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 12 (01) :88-93
[8]  
Sharp L, 2010, NATL CANC REGISTRY
[9]   Using free text information to explore how and when GPs code a diagnosis of ovarian cancer: an observational study using primary care records of patients with ovarian cancer [J].
Tate, A. Rosemary ;
Martin, Alexander G. R. ;
Ali, Aishath ;
Cassell, Jackie A. .
BMJ OPEN, 2011, 1 (01)
[10]   Determining the date of diagnosis - is it a simple matter? The impact of different approaches to dating diagnosis on estimates of delayed care for ovarian cancer in UK primary care [J].
Tate, A. Rosemary ;
Martin, Alexander G. R. ;
Murray-Thomas, Tarita ;
Anderson, Sarah R. ;
Cassell, Jackie A. .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2009, 9