Managing a second-generation crop portfolio through sustainable intensification: Examples from the USA and the EU

被引:73
作者
Heaton, Emily A. [1 ]
Schulte, Lisa A. [1 ]
Berti, Marisol [2 ]
Langeveld, Hans [3 ]
Zegada-Lizarazu, Walter [4 ]
Parrish, David [5 ]
Monti, Andrea [4 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Ames, IA USA
[2] N Dakota State Univ, Fargo, ND 58105 USA
[3] Biomass Res, Wageningen, Netherlands
[4] Univ Bologna, Bologna, Italy
[5] Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA USA
来源
BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR | 2013年 / 7卷 / 06期
基金
美国食品与农业研究所; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
food vs; fuel; agroecology; landscape management; bioenergy; biomass; ecosystem services; FUTURE ENERGY CROPS; LAND-USE; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; SEMIARID REGION; NORTHWEST CHINA; FILTER STRIPS; FOOD SECURITY; CORN-BELT; BIOMASS; AGRICULTURE;
D O I
10.1002/bbb.1429
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Sustainable intensification of agricultural systems has been suggested - in addition to reducing waste and changing consumption habits - as a way to increase food, feed, fuel, and fiber security in the twenty-first century. Here we describe three primary strategies of agricultural intensification - conventional intensification, temporal intensification, and spatial intensification - and how they can be used to manage and integrate food and second-generation crop portfolios. While each strategy has individual merits, combining them to meet case-specific targets may achieve optimum results. Multiple experiments and examples from the USA and the EU illustrate the potential of combining these approaches for agroecological intensification that can provide ecosystem services while maintaining or increasing economic output, thus striking a balance between land sparing' and land sharing'. Management strategies will vary by the types of markets available, e.g., food, fuel and/or ecosystem services, and the scale of markets supplied, e.g., small heat and power vs. large cellulosic ethanol. Future research should holistically and methodologically evaluate the trade-offs between different management strategies. (c) 2013 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
引用
收藏
页码:702 / 714
页数:13
相关论文
共 71 条
  • [31] Management to mitigate and adapt to climate change
    Lal, R.
    Delgado, J. A.
    Groffman, P. M.
    Millar, N.
    Dell, C.
    Rotz, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 2011, 66 (04) : 276 - 285
  • [32] Macdonald A L., 2012, Blurring the lines between production and conservation lands: Bird use of prairie strips in row-cropped landscapes
  • [33] Mitigating the impacts of the decline of traditional farming on mountain landscapes and biodiversity: a case study in the European Alps
    Marini, Lorenzo
    Klimek, Sebastian
    Battisti, Andrea
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2011, 14 (03) : 258 - 267
  • [34] The discrepancy between plot and field yields: Harvest and storage losses of switchgrass
    Monti, A.
    Fazio, S.
    Venturi, G.
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2009, 33 (05) : 841 - 847
  • [35] Long-term rotation and tillage effects on soil structure and crop yield
    Munkholm, Lars J.
    Heck, Richard J.
    Deen, Bill
    [J]. SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2013, 127 : 85 - 91
  • [36] Nickerson C., 2012, Trends in U.S. Farmland Values and Ownership
  • [37] STRATEGY OF ECOSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT
    ODUM, EP
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1969, 164 (3877) : 262 - +
  • [38] Ohde R.A. C., 2012, The use of reconstructed prairies in Iowa's agricultural landscape to increase ecosystem services and move towards multifunctional landscapes
  • [39] Topographic and soil influences on root productivity of three bioenergy cropping systems
    Ontl, Todd A.
    Hofmockel, Kirsten S.
    Cambardella, Cynthia A.
    Schulte, Lisa A.
    Kolka, Randall K.
    [J]. NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2013, 199 (03) : 727 - 737
  • [40] Some ecological and socio-economic considerations for biomass energy crop production
    Paine, LK
    Peterson, TL
    Undersander, DJ
    Rineer, KC
    Bartelt, GA
    Temple, SA
    Sample, DW
    Klemme, RM
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 1996, 10 (04) : 231 - 242