Managing a second-generation crop portfolio through sustainable intensification: Examples from the USA and the EU

被引:73
作者
Heaton, Emily A. [1 ]
Schulte, Lisa A. [1 ]
Berti, Marisol [2 ]
Langeveld, Hans [3 ]
Zegada-Lizarazu, Walter [4 ]
Parrish, David [5 ]
Monti, Andrea [4 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Ames, IA USA
[2] N Dakota State Univ, Fargo, ND 58105 USA
[3] Biomass Res, Wageningen, Netherlands
[4] Univ Bologna, Bologna, Italy
[5] Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA USA
来源
BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR | 2013年 / 7卷 / 06期
基金
美国食品与农业研究所; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
food vs; fuel; agroecology; landscape management; bioenergy; biomass; ecosystem services; FUTURE ENERGY CROPS; LAND-USE; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; SEMIARID REGION; NORTHWEST CHINA; FILTER STRIPS; FOOD SECURITY; CORN-BELT; BIOMASS; AGRICULTURE;
D O I
10.1002/bbb.1429
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Sustainable intensification of agricultural systems has been suggested - in addition to reducing waste and changing consumption habits - as a way to increase food, feed, fuel, and fiber security in the twenty-first century. Here we describe three primary strategies of agricultural intensification - conventional intensification, temporal intensification, and spatial intensification - and how they can be used to manage and integrate food and second-generation crop portfolios. While each strategy has individual merits, combining them to meet case-specific targets may achieve optimum results. Multiple experiments and examples from the USA and the EU illustrate the potential of combining these approaches for agroecological intensification that can provide ecosystem services while maintaining or increasing economic output, thus striking a balance between land sparing' and land sharing'. Management strategies will vary by the types of markets available, e.g., food, fuel and/or ecosystem services, and the scale of markets supplied, e.g., small heat and power vs. large cellulosic ethanol. Future research should holistically and methodologically evaluate the trade-offs between different management strategies. (c) 2013 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
引用
收藏
页码:702 / 714
页数:13
相关论文
共 71 条
  • [1] Biofuels on the landscape: Is "land sharing" preferable to "land sparing"?
    Anderson-Teixeira, Kristina J.
    Duval, Benjamin D.
    Long, Stephen P.
    DeLucia, Evan H.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2012, 22 (08) : 2035 - 2048
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2011, EIB80 USDA EC RES SE
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2009, NEW BIOL 21 CENT, DOI DOI 10.17226/12764
  • [4] [Anonymous], US BIOEN STAT
  • [5] Atwell RC, 2011, ECOL SOC, V16
  • [6] How to build multifunctional agricultural landscapes in the US Corn Belt: Add perennials and partnerships
    Atwell, Ryan C.
    Schulte, Lisa A.
    Westphal, Lynne M.
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2010, 27 (04) : 1082 - 1090
  • [7] Aboveground productivity and soil carbon storage of biofuel crops in Ohio
    Bonin, Catherine L.
    Lal, Rattan
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2014, 6 (01): : 67 - 75
  • [8] Lessons from nearly 20 years of Precision Agriculture research, development, and adoption as a guide to its appropriate application
    Bramley, R. G. V.
    [J]. CROP & PASTURE SCIENCE, 2009, 60 (03) : 197 - 217
  • [9] Reconciling biodiversity conservation and food security: scientific challenges for a new agriculture
    Brussaard, Lijbert
    Caron, Patrick
    Campbell, Bruce
    Lipper, Leslie
    Mainka, Susan
    Rabbinge, Rudy
    Babin, Didier
    Pulleman, Mirjam
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2010, 2 (1-2) : 34 - 42
  • [10] The Value of Variable Rate Technology: An Information-Theoretic Approach
    Bullock, David S.
    Ruffo, Matias L.
    Bullock, Donald G.
    Bollero, German A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 91 (01) : 209 - 223