Planetary boundaries, equity and global sustainability: why wealthy countries could benefit from more equity

被引:63
作者
Steffen, Will [1 ,2 ]
Smith, Mark Stafford [3 ]
机构
[1] Stockholm Univ, Stockholm Resilience Ctr, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Fenner Sch Environm & Soc, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[3] CSIRO Climate Adaptat Flagship, Canberra, ACT, Australia
关键词
SAFE OPERATING SPACE; INCOME INEQUALITY; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SHIFT; STATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.cosust.2013.04.007
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The planetary boundaries concept, which aims to define a safe operating space for humanity within the dynamics of the Earth System, has often been criticised on the basis of a presumed conflict between global equity and environmental sustainability goals. However, a re-analysis of the equity-environmental sustainability relationship suggests that significant synergies can be developed to build a more unified approach for working towards global sustainability. The synergies are especially strong for those planetary boundaries based on processes that are aggregated from very heterogeneous distributions at sub-global levels. It is possible to address the biophysical aspects of these boundaries from an Earth System perspective in ways that often may be, and sometimes must be, compatible with enhancing many aspects of social equity. Furthermore, it may well be in the self-interest of wealthy nations to achieve a more spatially equitable world in terms of access to resources and ecosystem services. Combining social equity considerations with the biophysical planetary boundaries approach may therefore constitute a necessary, and perhaps even sufficient, condition for achieving global sustainability.
引用
收藏
页码:403 / 408
页数:6
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [21] We must set planetary boundaries wisely
    Lewis, Simon L.
    [J]. NATURE, 2012, 485 (7399) : 417 - 417
  • [22] Agronomic phosphorus imbalances across the world's croplands
    MacDonald, Graham K.
    Bennett, Elena M.
    Potter, Philip A.
    Ramankutty, Navin
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2011, 108 (07) : 3086 - 3091
  • [23] Najam Adil., 2004, The Global Environment: Institutions, Law, and Policy, V2nd, P225
  • [24] Notenbaert A., 2011, 5 CCAFS
  • [25] The toxicology of climate change: Environmental contaminants in a warming world
    Noyes, Pamela D.
    McElwee, Matthew K.
    Miller, Hilary D.
    Clark, Bryan W.
    Van Tiem, Lindsey A.
    Walcott, Kia C.
    Erwin, Kyle N.
    Levin, Edward D.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 35 (06) : 971 - 986
  • [26] Nussbaum M.C., 2011, Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach
  • [27] OECD, 2011, GREEN GROWTH, P142
  • [28] Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change
    Ostrom, Elinor
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2010, 20 (04): : 550 - 557
  • [29] A new climate-vegetation equilibrium state for tropical South America
    Oyama, MD
    Nobre, CA
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2003, 30 (23) : CLM5 - 1
  • [30] Characterizing the Spatial Patterns of Global Fertilizer Application and Manure Production
    Potter, Philip
    Ramankutty, Navin
    Bennett, Elena M.
    Donner, Simon D.
    [J]. EARTH INTERACTIONS, 2010, 14 : 1 - 22