A note on the nature of utility in time and health and implications for cost utility analysis

被引:14
作者
Buckingham, Ken J. [2 ]
Devlin, Nancy Joy [1 ]
机构
[1] City Univ London, Dept Econ, London EC1 V OHB, England
[2] Univ Otago, Dept Prevent & Social Med, Dunedin, New Zealand
关键词
Time Trade-Off (TTO); Utility; QALYs; Cost utility analysis; Maximal endurable time; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; EXTRA-WELFARISM; STATES WORSE; TRADE-OFF; PREFERENCES; VALUATIONS; VALIDITY; QALYS; DEATH; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.09.048
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Time Trade-Off (TTO) valuations of health are widely used in economic evaluation of health care. Current approaches to eliciting TTO values, and their use in economic evaluation, rest on specific assumptions about the way utility relates to time and health. Both the assumptions themselves and evidence of violations of them are discussed in the literature - yet the issues appear not to be widely appreciated by those using and applying TTO in economic evaluation. This paper adds to that literature by demonstrating both the requirements of TTO and violations of these assumptions in terms of the underlying indifference curve maps and utility functions. The advantage of this approach is that it demonstrates very clearly a number of fundamental problems for the way TTO values are currently elicited and used in cost utility analysis. In essence, it is extremely unwise to assume that the current 'tariffs' of TTO values, such as those widely used in cost utility analysis to inform health sector decisions in many countries can be applied irrespective of the duration of the health states to which they are assigned. The estimates of QALYs that result will, quite often, simply be wrong. We conclude by pointing to a number of possible solutions. (C) 2008 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:362 / 367
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Arnesen T M, 2003, Med Humanit, V29, P81, DOI 10.1136/mh.29.2.81
  • [2] Valuing the benefits and costs of health care programmes: where's the 'extra' in extra-welfarism?
    Birch, S
    Donaldson, C
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2003, 56 (05) : 1121 - 1133
  • [3] The validity of QALYs: An experimental test of constant proportional tradeoff and utility independence
    Bleichrodt, H
    Johannesson, M
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1997, 17 (01) : 21 - 32
  • [4] Welfarism vs. extra-welfarism
    Brouwer, Werner B. F.
    Culyer, Anthony J.
    van Exel, N. Job A.
    Rutten, Frans F. H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2008, 27 (02) : 325 - 338
  • [5] A theoretical framework for TTO valuations of health
    Buckingham, Ken
    Devlin, Nancy
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2006, 15 (10) : 1149 - 1154
  • [6] Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states
    Dolan, P
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 1997, 35 (11) : 1095 - 1108
  • [7] The validity of time trade-off values in calculating QALYs: constant proportional time trade-off versus the proportional heuristic
    Dolan, P
    Stalmeier, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2003, 22 (03) : 445 - 458
  • [8] Drummond MF, 2005, Methods for The Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes
  • [9] Death and the valuation of health-related quality of life
    Macran, S
    Kind, P
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 2001, 39 (03) : 217 - 227
  • [10] QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS, UTILITY-THEORY, AND HEALTHY-YEARS EQUIVALENTS
    MEHREZ, A
    GAFNI, A
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1989, 9 (02) : 142 - 149