Lexical differentiation in language production and comprehension

被引:17
作者
Yoon, Si On [1 ]
Brown-Schmidt, Sarah [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Psychol, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
关键词
Language production; Comprehension; Lexical differentiation; Eye-tracking; Modification; Conversation; REFERRING EXPRESSIONS; REFERENTIAL DOMAINS; PERSPECTIVE-TAKING; EYE-MOVEMENTS; SPEAKERS; CONVERSATION; INFORMATION; OVERSPECIFICATION; COORDINATION; ADDRESSEES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jml.2013.05.005
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
This paper presents the results of three experiments that explore the breadth of the relevant discourse context in language production and comprehension. Previous evidence from language production suggests the relevant context is quite broad, based on findings that speakers differentiate new discourse referents from similar referents discussed in past contexts (Van Der Wege, 2009). Experiment 1 replicated and extended this "lexical differentiation" effect by demonstrating that speakers used two different mechanisms, modification, and the use of subordinate level nouns, to differentiate current from past referents. In Experiments 2 and 3, we examined whether addressees expect speakers to differentiate. The results of these experiments did not support the hypothesis that listeners expect differentiation, for either lexically differentiated modified expressions (Experiment 2), nor for subordinate level nouns (Experiment 3). Taken together, the present findings suggest that the breadth of relevant discourse context differs across language production and comprehension. Speakers show more sensitivity to things they have said before, possibly due to better knowledge of the relevant context. In contrast, listeners have the task of inferring what the speaker believes is the relevant context: this inferential process may be more error-prone. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:397 / 416
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   The role of executive function in perspective taking during online language comprehension [J].
Brown-Schmidt, Sarah .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2009, 16 (05) :893-900
[22]   Lexical prediction in language comprehension: a replication study of grammatical gender effects in Dutch [J].
Kochari, Arnold R. ;
Flecken, Monique .
LANGUAGE COGNITION AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 34 (02) :239-253
[23]   Production, comprehension, and synthesis: a communicative perspective on language [J].
Ramscar, Michael ;
Baayen, Harald .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 4
[24]   A developmental perspective on the integration of language production and comprehension [J].
Krishnan, Saloni .
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 2013, 36 (04) :363-364
[25]   Cerebral asymmetry for language: Comparing production with comprehension [J].
Haeberling, Isabelle S. ;
Steinemann, Anita ;
Corballis, Michael C. .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2016, 80 :17-23
[26]   Critical Thinking About Fables: Examining Language Production and Comprehension in Adolescents [J].
Nippold, Marilyn A. ;
Frantz-Kaspar, Megan W. ;
Cramond, Paige M. ;
Kirk, Cecilia ;
Hayward-Mayhew, Christine ;
MacKinnon, Melanie .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2015, 58 (02) :325-335
[27]   Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis [J].
Linck, Jared A. ;
Osthus, Peter ;
Koeth, Joel T. ;
Bunting, Michael F. .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2014, 21 (04) :861-883
[28]   Syntactic influences on lexical and morphological processing in language production [J].
Ferreira, VS ;
Humphreys, KR .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2001, 44 (01) :52-80
[29]   Bilingualism and ageing independently impact on language processing: evidence from comprehension and production [J].
Fernandes, Eunice G. ;
Segaert, Katrien ;
Rahman, Foyzul ;
Wetterlin, Allison ;
Wheeldon, Linda .
BILINGUALISM-LANGUAGE AND COGNITION, 2025, 28 (03) :778-792
[30]   Production Practice During Language Learning Improves Comprehension [J].
Hopman, Elise W. M. ;
MacDonald, Maryellen C. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2018, 29 (06) :961-971