The Sexunzipped Trial: Optimizing the Design of Online Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:38
|
作者
Bailey, Julia V. [1 ]
Pavlou, Menelaos [2 ]
Copas, Andrew [3 ]
McCarthy, Ona [4 ]
Carswell, Ken [5 ]
Rait, Greta [6 ]
Hart, Graham [7 ]
Nazareth, Irwin [6 ]
Free, Caroline [4 ]
French, Rebecca [4 ]
Murray, Elizabeth [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Res Dept Primary Care & Populat Hlth, E Hlth Unit, London, England
[2] UCL, Dept Stat Sci, London, England
[3] UCL, Dept Infect & Populat Hlth, London, England
[4] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, London WC1, England
[5] Univ London, London, England
[6] UCL, PRIMENT Clin Trials Unit, Res Dept Primary Care & Populat Hlth, London, England
[7] UCL, Fac Populat Hlth Sci, London, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Internet; randomized controlled trials as topic; outcome assessment (health care); sexual health; sexually transmitted diseases; behavioral research; SEXUAL HEALTH; YOUNG-PEOPLE; INTERVENTIONS; RETENTION; RECRUITMENT; POPULATION; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.2196/jmir.2668
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Sexual health problems such as unwanted pregnancy and sexually transmitted infection are important public health concerns and there is huge potential for health promotion using digital interventions. Evaluations of digital interventions are increasingly conducted online. Trial administration and data collection online offers many advantages, but concerns remain over fraudulent registration to obtain compensation, the quality of self-reported data, and high attrition. Objective: This study addresses the feasibility of several dimensions of online trial design-recruitment, online consent, participant identity verification, randomization and concealment of allocation, online data collection, data quality, and retention at 3-month follow-up. Methods: Young people aged 16 to 20 years and resident in the United Kingdom were recruited to the "Sexunzipped" online trial between November 2010 and March 2011 (n=2036). Participants filled in baseline demographic and sexual health questionnaires online and were randomized to the Sexunzipped interactive intervention website or to an information-only control website. Participants were also randomly allocated to a postal request (or no request) for a urine sample for genital chlamydia testing and receipt of a lower (10 pound/US$16) or higher (20 pound/US$32) value shopping voucher compensation for 3-month outcome data. Results: The majority of the 2006 valid participants (90.98%, 1825/2006) were aged between 18 and 20 years at enrolment, from all four countries in the United Kingdom. Most were white (89.98%, 1805/2006), most were in school or training (77.48%, 1545/1994), and 62.81% (1260/2006) of the sample were female. In total, 3.88% (79/2036) of registrations appeared to be invalid and another 4.00% (81/2006) of participants gave inconsistent responses within the questionnaire. The higher value compensation (20 pound/US$32) increased response rates by 6-10%, boosting retention at 3 months to 77.2% (166/215) for submission of online self-reported sexual health outcomes and 47.4% (118/249) for return of chlamydia urine samples by post. Conclusions: It was quick and efficient to recruit young people to this online trial. Our procedures for obtaining online consent, verifying participant identity, automated randomization, and concealment of allocation worked well. The optimal response rate for the online sexual health outcome measurement was comparable to face-to-face trials. Multiple methods of participant contact, requesting online data only, and higher value compensation increased trial retention at 3-month follow-up.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Sexunzipped Trial: Young People's Views of Participating in an Online Randomized Controlled Trial
    Nicholas, Angela
    Bailey, Julia V.
    Stevenson, Fiona
    Murray, Elizabeth
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2013, 15 (12)
  • [2] Impact of Length or Relevance of Questionnaires on Attrition in Online Trials: Randomized Controlled Trial
    McCambridge, Jim
    Kalaitzaki, Eleftheria
    White, Ian R.
    Khadjesari, Zarnie
    Murray, Elizabeth
    Linke, Stuart
    Thompson, Simon G.
    Godfrey, Christine
    Wallace, Paul
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2011, 13 (04)
  • [3] Impact and Costs of Incentives to Reduce Attrition in Online Trials: Two Randomized Controlled Trials
    Khadjesari, Zarnie
    Murray, Elizabeth
    Kalaitzaki, Eleftheria
    White, Ian R.
    McCambridge, Jim
    Thompson, Simon G.
    Wallace, Paul
    Godfrey, Christine
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2011, 13 (01)
  • [4] Randomized Controlled Trial of Online Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Fibromyalgia
    Simister, Heather D.
    Tkachuk, Gregg A.
    Shay, Barbara L.
    Vincent, Norah
    Pear, Joseph J.
    Skrabek, Ryan Q.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2018, 19 (07) : 741 - 753
  • [5] Perspective: Design and Conduct of Human Nutrition Randomized Controlled Trials
    Lichtenstein, Alice H.
    Petersen, Kristina
    Barger, Kathryn
    Hansen, Karen E.
    Anderson, Cheryl A. M.
    Baer, David J.
    Lampe, Johanna W.
    Rasmussen, Helen
    Matthan, Nirupa R.
    ADVANCES IN NUTRITION, 2021, 12 (01) : 4 - 20
  • [6] The cohort multiple randomized controlled trial design: a valid and efficient alternative to pragmatic trials?
    van der Velden, Joanne M.
    Verkooijen, Helena M.
    Young-Afat, Danny A.
    Burbach, Johannes P. M.
    van Vulpen, Marco
    Relton, Clare
    van Gils, Carla H.
    May, Anne M.
    Groenwold, Rolf H. H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 46 (01) : 96 - 102
  • [7] Recruiting to Clinical Trials on the Telephone - a randomized controlled trial
    Foss, Kim Thestrup
    Kjaergaard, Jesper
    Stensballe, Lone Graff
    Greisen, Gorm
    TRIALS, 2016, 17
  • [8] Recruiting to Clinical Trials on the Telephone – a randomized controlled trial
    Kim Thestrup Foss
    Jesper Kjærgaard
    Lone Graff Stensballe
    Gorm Greisen
    Trials, 17
  • [9] Potential of Online Recruitment Among 15-25-Year Olds: Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial
    Hoffmann, Sofie Have
    Folker, Anna Paldam
    Buskbjerg, Mark
    Folker, Marie Paldam
    Jezek, Andrea Huber
    Svarta, Durita Lyngso
    Solvhoj, Ida Nielsen
    Thygesen, Lau
    JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH, 2022, 6 (05)
  • [10] Intention-to-Treat in Randomized Controlled Trials: Recommendations for a Total Trial Strategy
    Polit, Denise F.
    Gillespie, Brigid M.
    RESEARCH IN NURSING & HEALTH, 2010, 33 (04) : 355 - 368