An Investigation of College Students' Perceptions of Academic Dishonesty, Reasons for Dishonesty, Achievement Goals, and Willingness to Report Dishonest Behavior

被引:63
作者
Yang, Shu Ching [1 ]
Huang, Chiao-Ling [1 ]
Chen, An-Sing [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Sun Yat Sen Univ, Grad Inst Educ, Kaohsiung 80424, Taiwan
[2] Natl Chung Chen Univ, Dept Finance, Minxueng, Taiwan
关键词
academic dishonesty behaviors; academic dishonesty motivation; willingness to report academic dishonesty; achievement goals; college students; CHEATING BEHAVIOR; MOTIVATION; SCHOOL; DETERMINANTS; ATTITUDES; BELIEFS; MIDDLE; IMPACT; SCALE;
D O I
10.1080/10508422.2013.802651
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
This study investigated students' perceptions of their own and their peers' academic dishonesty (AD), their reasons for this dishonesty, their achievement goals, and their willingness to report AD (WRAD) within a Chinese cultural context. The results identified students' belief that their peers had a greater likelihood of engaging in AD and had more motivation to do so than did the students themselves. Gender and academic major did not affect students' WRAD. However, students were significantly more willing to report classmates than friends. In terms of the participants' self-perceptions and peer perceptions concerning motivations for AD, more female students cited the lack of penalties as the reason for their own and their peers' AD, whereas male students more frequently cited their lack of attention to schoolwork as the reason for their own AD. In contrast to students in the social sciences, business students more frequently cited inadequate capabilities as the reason for their AD, and engineering students more frequently attributed their AD to self-interest. Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that three motivations for AD (opportunism, inadequacy, and self-promotion) could positively predict AD, whereas mastery-approach goals could negatively predict AD.
引用
收藏
页码:501 / 522
页数:22
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   Exploring the types and reasons of internet-triggered academic dishonesty among Turkish undergraduate students:: Development of Internet-Triggered Academic Dishonesty Scale (ITADS) [J].
Akbulut, Yavuz ;
Sendag, Serkan ;
Birinci, Guerkay ;
Kilicer, Kerem ;
Sahin, Mehmet C. ;
Odabasi, Hatice F. .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2008, 51 (01) :463-473
[2]  
Anderman E.M., 2007, PSYCHOL ACAD CHEATIN, P87, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-012372541-7/50008-5
[3]   Changes in self-reported academic cheating across the transition from middle school to high school [J].
Anderman, EM ;
Midgley, C .
CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 29 (04) :499-517
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ACAD MANAG LEARN EDU
[5]  
Athanasou J.A., 2002, Practical Assessment, Research Evaluation, V8, P37
[6]   MOTIVATIONAL DETERMINANTS OF RISK-TAKING BEHAVIOR [J].
ATKINSON, JW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1957, 64 (06) :359-372
[7]   Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective [J].
Bandura, A .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 52 :1-26
[8]  
Bandura A., 1986, SOCIAL FDN THOUGHT A
[9]  
Bond M.H., 1986, The psychology of the Chinese people, P213
[10]   Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really? [J].
Bong, M ;
Skaalvik, EM .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2003, 15 (01) :1-40