Energy storage subsidy estimation for microgrid: A real option game-theoretic approach

被引:47
作者
Chen, Weidong [1 ]
Zeng, Yu [1 ]
Xu, Chongqing [2 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, Coll Management & Econ, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Acad Sci, Ecol Inst, Jinan 250000, Shandong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Microgrid; Energy storage subsidy; Evolutionary game theory; Real option; POWER-GENERATION; SYSTEM DYNAMICS; CHINA; MODEL; TECHNOLOGY; INVESTMENTS; INCENTIVES; STRATEGIES; VALUATION; INDUSTRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.232
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Microgrid development is presently limited due to high costs, especially its energy storage system (ESS) component. ESS subsidy policies, as the main response options, seem essential to be explored to promote the diffusion of microgrid. In this study, we propose an evolutionary game model combined with real options to guide ESS subsidy policies for microgrid by applying to a small electricity network served by a regulated utility. As there exists market share arrangements during the game, a multi-objective programming is formulated to determine the optimal investment capacity for each market participant. To evaluate our model, we provide a numerical example to demonstrate how different ESS subsidies affect the fluctuation amplitudes and equilibrium positions in microgrid diffusion process. The results indicate that price subsidy for energy storage has more significant effect than initial cost subsidy for microgrid development. In addition, although the importance of ESS electricity price subsidy is reflected, its combination with initial cost subsidy may both ensure investment value of microgrid and reduce the initial cost of such a capital-intensive component.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 382
页数:10
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Adkins R, 2017, EUR J FINANC, V23, P1
[2]   The economics of distributed energy generation: A literature review [J].
Allan, Grant ;
Eromenko, Igor ;
Gilmartin, Michelle ;
Kockar, Ivana ;
McGregor, Peter .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 42 :543-556
[3]   Optimal exit and valuation under demand uncertainty: A real options approach [J].
Alvarez, LHR .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1999, 114 (02) :320-329
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, SUSTAINABILITY BASEL, DOI DOI 10.3390/SU10010163
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2017, ZHEJIANG STAT YB
[6]  
[Anonymous], China Economic Times
[7]   Developing real option game models [J].
Azevedo, Alcino ;
Paxson, Dean .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2014, 237 (03) :909-920
[8]   Energy Storage Technologies: The Past and the Present [J].
Boicea, Valentin A. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 2014, 102 (11) :1777-1794
[9]   Compound real option valuation with phase-specific volatility: A multi-phase mobile payments case study [J].
Cassimon, D. ;
Engelen, P. J. ;
Yordanov, V. .
TECHNOVATION, 2011, 31 (5-6) :240-255
[10]  
China Electricity Council, 2015, CHINA POWER ENTERPRI, V3, P24