Effect of Road Narrowing on Junction Capacity Using Microsimulation

被引:5
作者
Yousif, Saad [1 ]
Alterawi, Mohammed [1 ]
Henson, Ralph R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Salford, Manchester M5 4WT, Lancs, England
关键词
Traffic calming; Throttle; Cooperative behavior; Priority junction; Microsimulation;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000534
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Traffic-calming measures have been widely used in urban areas, aiming sometimes to reduce vehicle flow rates but primarily to reduce speed and, hence, the number and severity of traffic accidents. The one-way priority working road narrowing (throttle) is a widely used traffic-calming technique. However, installation of such a measure close to a junction can severely affect the operation and level of service, especially for the major road movements. There is a lack of research, guidance, and design standards to inform the effective deployment of such a measure. This paper starts by providing a summary of the terms and standards used in practice for traffic-calming measures, primarily focusing on the use of throttles. The paper aims to investigate the relationship between throttle spacing (X) from a priority junction and the "major-to-major movement" driver's delay for different flow levels using the S-Paramics microsimulation model. The model was calibrated and validated with field data collected from a selected site within Greater Manchester for two separate days by using camcorders. Cooperative behavior between drivers (i.e., those with priority who gave way to others) was noticed and analyzed accordingly. Different scenarios were used to test the effects on delays and queues for various parameters including throttle spacing (X), major-arms flow level, and reversing the direction of priority. The findings show that there is a direct relationship between throttle spacing (X) and the level of delay for traffic on the major arms of the junction. It is also shown that for a minor arm with two-way flow level of up to 500 vehicles per hour (veh/h), the throttle spacing should be at least 30 m. Once the flow level reaches 700 veh/h, the spacing should be at least 50 m, whereas for flow levels of 800 veh/h, the spacing should be at least 100 meters. Alternatively, consideration should be given to reversing the priority given to traffic by using MJTP (major-arm traffic has priority) operation rather than MNTP (minor-arm traffic has priority) when less throttle spacing (X) is required, to minimize delays to traffic on the major arms. (C) 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页码:574 / 584
页数:11
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Aberdeenshire Council, 2011, TRAFF CALM
[2]   Microsimulation Model for Motorway Merges With Ramp-Metering Controls [J].
Al-Obaedi, Jalal ;
Yousif, Saad .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2012, 13 (01) :296-306
[3]  
[Anonymous], CAN GUID NEIGHB TRAF
[4]  
[Anonymous], S PAR 2010 1
[5]   A model of speed profiles for traffic calmed roads [J].
Barbosa, HM ;
Tight, MR ;
May, AD .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2000, 34 (02) :103-123
[6]  
Barceló J, 2005, OPER RES COMPUT SCI, V31, P57
[7]  
Buchanan C., 1963, TRAFFIC TOWNS STUDY
[8]  
*COUNT SURV SOC, 1994, TRAFF CALM PRACT
[9]  
Dept. for Transport, 1999, TRAFF ADV LEAFL 13 9
[10]  
Dept. for Transport, 2006, ROAD SAF GOOD PRACT