A comparison between the clinical frailty scale and the hospital frailty risk score to risk stratify older people with emergency care needs

被引:9
作者
Alshibani, Abdullah [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Coats, Tim [4 ,5 ]
Maynou, Laia [6 ,7 ,8 ]
Lecky, Fiona [9 ]
Banerjee, Jay [1 ,4 ]
Conroy, Simon [10 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leicester, Coll Life Sci, Dept Hlth Sci, Leicester LE1 7HA, Leics, England
[2] King Saud Bin Abdulaziz Univ Hlth Sci, Coll Appl Med Sci, Emergency Med Serv Dept, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[3] King Abdullah Int Med Res Ctr, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[4] Univ Hosp Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, Leics, England
[5] Univ Leicester, Emergency Med Acad Grp, Dept Cardiovasc Sci, Leicester, Leics, England
[6] London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, Dept Hlth Policy, London, England
[7] Univ Barcelona, Dept Econ Econometr & Appl Econ, Barcelona, Spain
[8] Univ Pompeu Fabra, Ctr Res Hlth & Econ CRES, Barcelona, Spain
[9] Univ Sheffield, Ctr Urgent & Emergency Care Res, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[10] UCL, MRC Unit Lifelong Hlth & Ageing, London, England
关键词
Geriatric; Elderly; Urgent Care; Frailty; Correlation; Outcome; OUTCOMES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1186/s12873-022-00730-5
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background Older adults living with frailty who require treatment in hospitals are increasingly seen in the Emergency Departments (EDs). One quick and simple frailty assessment tool-the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS)-has been embedded in many EDs in the United Kingdom (UK). However, it carries time/training and cost burden and has significant missing data. The Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) can be automated and has the potential to reduce costs and increase data availability, but has not been tested for predictive accuracy in the ED. The aim of this study is to assess the correlation between and the ability of the CFS at the ED and HFRS to predict hospital-related outcomes. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study using data from Leicester Royal Infirmary hospital during the period from 01/10/2017 to 30/09/2019. We included individuals aged + 75 years as the HFRS has been only validated for this population. We assessed the correlation between the CFS and HFRS using Pearson's correlation coefficient for the continuous scores and weighted kappa scores for the categorised scores. We developed logistic regression models (unadjusted and adjusted) to estimate Odds Ratios (ORs) and Confidence Intervals (CIs), so we can assess the ability of the CFS and HFRS to predict 30-day mortality, Length of Stay (LOS) > 10 days, and 30-day readmission. Results Twelve thousand two hundred thirty seven individuals met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 84.6 years (SD 5.9) and 7,074 (57.8%) were females. Between the CFS and HFRS, the Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.36 and weighted kappa score was 0.15. When comparing the highest frailty categories to the lowest frailty category within each frailty score, the ORs for 30-day mortality, LOS > 10 days, and 30-day readmission using the CFS were 2.26, 1.36, and 1.64 and for the HFRS 2.16, 7.68, and 1.19. Conclusion The CFS collected at the ED and the HFRS had low/slight agreement. Both frailty scores were shown to be predictors of adverse outcomes. More research is needed to assess the use of historic HFRS in the ED.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Bonjour T, 2021, AGE AGEING, V50, P1306, DOI [DOI 10.1093/AGEING/AFAA278, 10.1093/ageing/afaa278]
  • [2] The hospital frailty risk score is of limited value in intensive care unit patients
    Bruno, Raphael Romano
    Wernly, Bernhard
    Flaatten, Hans
    Schoelzel, Fabian
    Kelm, Malte
    Jung, Christian
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2019, 23 (1):
  • [3] A NEW METHOD OF CLASSIFYING PROGNOSTIC CO-MORBIDITY IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION
    CHARLSON, ME
    POMPEI, P
    ALES, KL
    MACKENZIE, CR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (05): : 373 - 383
  • [4] Validation of the hospital frailty risk score in a tertiary care hospital in Switzerland: results of a prospective, observational study
    Eckart, Andreas
    Hauser, Stephanie Isabelle
    Haubitz, Sebastian
    Struja, Tristan
    Kutz, Alexander
    Koch, Daniel
    Neeser, Olivia
    Meier, Marc A.
    Mueller, Beat
    Schuetz, Philipp
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (01):
  • [5] Does the Clinical Frailty Scale at Triage Predict Outcomes From Emergency Care for Older People?
    Elliott, Amy
    Taub, Nick
    Banerjee, Jay
    Aijaz, Faisal
    Jones, Will
    Teece, Lucy
    van Oppen, James
    Conroy, Simon
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 77 (06) : 620 - 627
  • [6] Identifying frailty in the Emergency Department-feasibility study
    Elliott, Amy
    Phelps, Kay
    Regen, Emma
    Conroy, Simon Paul
    [J]. AGE AND AGEING, 2017, 46 (05) : 840 - 845
  • [7] External validation of the Hospital Frailty Risk Score in France
    Gilbert, Thomas
    Cordier, Quentin
    Polazzi, Stephanie
    Bonnefoy, Marc
    Keeble, Eilis
    Street, Andrew
    Conroy, Simon
    Duclos, Antoine
    [J]. AGE AND AGEING, 2022, 51 (01)
  • [8] Development and validation of a Hospital Frailty Risk Score focusing on older people in acute care settings using electronic hospital records: an observational study
    Gilbert, Thomas
    Neuburger, Jenny
    Kraindler, Joshua
    Keeble, Eilis
    Smith, Paul
    Ariti, Cono
    Arora, Sandeepa
    Street, Andrew
    Parker, Stuart
    Roberts, Helen C.
    Bardsley, Martin
    Conroy, Simon
    [J]. LANCET, 2018, 391 (10132) : 1775 - 1782
  • [9] Utility of the Hospital Frailty Risk Score for Predicting Adverse Outcomes in Degenerative Spine Surgery Cohorts
    Hannah, Theodore C.
    Neifert, Sean N.
    Caridi, John M.
    Martini, Michael L.
    Lamb, Colin
    Rothrock, Robert J.
    Yuk, Frank J.
    Gilligan, Jeffrey
    Genadry, Lisa
    Gal, Jonathan S.
    [J]. NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 87 (06) : 1223 - 1230
  • [10] The prevalence of frailty and its association with clinical outcomes in general surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hewitt, Jonathan
    Long, Sara
    Carter, Ben
    Bach, Simon
    McCarthy, Kathryn
    Clegg, Andrew
    [J]. AGE AND AGEING, 2018, 47 (06) : 793 - 800