共 50 条
Adjusting D-dimer to Lung Disease Extent to Exclude Pulmonary Embolism in COVID-19 Patients (Co-LEAD)
被引:6
|作者:
Planquette, Benjamin
[1
,2
,3
,4
]
Khider, Lina
[2
,5
,6
]
Le Berre, Alice
[7
]
Soudet, Simon
[8
,9
]
Pernod, Gilles
[4
,10
]
Le Mao, Raphael
[4
,11
]
Besutti, Matthieu
[12
]
Gendron, Nicolas
[1
,2
,4
,13
]
Yanoutsos, Alexandra
[14
,15
]
Smadja, David M.
[16
]
Goudot, Guillaume
[2
,5
,6
]
Al Kahf, Salma
[1
,2
,3
,4
]
Mohamedi, Nassim
[2
,5
,6
]
Al Hamoud, Antoine
[1
,2
,3
,4
]
Philippe, Aurelien
[1
,2
,4
,13
]
Fournier, Laure
[16
]
Rance, Bastien
[17
]
Diehl, Jean-Luc
[1
,2
,18
]
Mirault, Tristan
[5
,20
]
Messas, Emmanuel
[5
,7
,19
]
Emmerich, Joseph
[14
,15
]
Chocron, Richard
[20
]
Couturaud, Francis
[4
,11
]
Ferretti, Gilbert
[21
]
Sevestre, Marie Antoinette
[8
,9
]
Meneveau, Nicolas
[12
]
Chatellier, Gilles
[22
]
Sanchez, Olivier
[1
,2
,3
,4
]
机构:
[1] Univ Paris, INSERM, Innovat Therapies Haemostasis, Paris, France
[2] Univ Paris, Biosurg Res Lab, Carpentier Fdn, Paris, France
[3] Ctr Univ Paris AP HP CUP, AP HP, Dept Resp Med, Paris, France
[4] F CRIN INNOVTE, St Etienne, France
[5] Ctr Univ Paris AP HP CUP, AP HP, Dept Vasc Med, Paris, France
[6] ESPCI Paris, INSERM U1273, Phys Med Paris, Paris, France
[7] Grp Hosp Paris St Joseph, Dept Radiol, Paris, France
[8] Univ Picardie Jules Verne, EA7516 CHIMERE, CHU Amiens Picardie, Amiens, France
[9] Univ Picardie Jules Verne, CHU Amiens Picardie, Serv Med Vasc, Amiens, France
[10] Univ Grenoble Alpes, Serv Univ Med Vasc, CRIN INNOVTE, CHU Grenoble Alpes,CNRS TIMC IMAG UMR 5525,Themas, F-38043 Grenoble, France
[11] Univ Bretagne Occidentale, CHU Brest, Dept Med Interne & Pneumol, EA 3878,CIC INSERM 1412, Brest, France
[12] Univ Burgundy Franche Comte, Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, EA3920, Besancon, France
[13] Ctr Univ Paris AP HP CUP, AP HP, Dept Haematol, Paris, France
[14] Grp Hosp Paris St Joseph, Dept Vasc Med, Paris, France
[15] INSERM CRESS UMR 1153, Dept Vasc Med, Paris, France
[16] Univ Paris, Ctr Univ Paris AP HP CUP, AP HP, Dept Radiol, Paris, France
[17] Univ Paris, Ctr Univ Paris AP HP Cup, AP HP, Dept Med Informat, Paris, France
[18] Ctr Univ Paris AP HP CUP, AP HP, Intens Care Unit, Paris, France
[19] INSERM UMR S 970, PARCC, Paris Res Cardiovasc Ctr, Dept Vasc Med, Paris, France
[20] Univ Paris, Ctr Univ Paris AP HP CUP, AP HP, PARCC,INSERM,Dept Emergency, Paris, France
[21] Univ Grenoble Alpes, Dept Radiol, CHU, St Etienne, France
[22] INSERM CIC 14 18, Dept Stat Bioinformat & Publ Hlth, Paris, France
关键词:
pulmonary embolism;
COVID-19;
D-dimer;
computed tomography;
diagnosis;
EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT PATIENTS;
RULE-OUT CRITERIA;
VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM;
DIAGNOSIS;
COMPLICATIONS;
MULTICENTER;
PREVALENCE;
MANAGEMENT;
RISK;
D O I:
10.1055/a-1768-4371
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
Objective D-dimer measurement is a safe tool to exclude pulmonary embolism (PE), but its specificity decreases in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. Our aim was to derive a new algorithm with a specific D-dimer threshold for COVID-19 patients. Methods We conducted a French multicenter, retrospective cohort study among 774 COVID-19 patients with suspected PE. D-dimer threshold adjusted to extent of lung damage found on computed tomography (CT) was derived in a patient set (n = 337), and its safety assessed in an independent validation set (n = 337). Results According to receiver operating characteristic curves, in the derivation set, D-dimer safely excluded PE, with one false negative, when using a 900 ng/mL threshold when lung damage extent was <50% and 1,700 ng/mL when lung damage extent was >= 50%. In the derivation set, the algorithm sensitivity was 98.2% (95% confidence interval [CIJ: 94.7-100.0) and its specificity 28.4% (95% CI: 24.1-32.3). The negative likelihood ratio (NLR) was 0.06 (95% CI: 0.01-0.44) and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.63 (95% CI: 0.60-0.67). In the validation set, sensitivity and specificity were 96.7% (95% CI: 88.7-99.6) and 39.2% (95% CI: 32.2-46.1), respectively. The NLR was 0.08 (95% CI; 0.02-0.33), and the AUC did not differ from that of the derivation set (0.68, 95% CI: 0.64-0.72, p = 0.097). Using the Co-LEAD algorithm, 76 among 250 (30.4%) COVID-19 patients with suspected PE could have been managed without CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) and 88 patients would have required two CTs. Conclusion The Co-LEAD algorithm could safely exclude PE, and could reduce the use of CTPA in COVID-19 patients. Further prospective studies need to validate this strategy.
引用
收藏
页码:1888 / 1898
页数:11
相关论文