Redefining the EdD: Seeking a Separate Identity

被引：7

作者：

Boyce, Barbara Ann ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Virginia, Dept Human Serv, Charlottesville, VA USA

来源：

QUEST | 2012年 / 64卷 / 01期

关键词：

Capstone project; Carnegie group; doctorate/doctor of education; preparation of PETE/APE supervisors; signature pedagogies;

D O I：

10.1080/00336297.2012.653260

中图分类号：

G40 [教育学];

学科分类号：

040101 ; 120403 ;

摘要：

The purpose of this manuscript was to discuss the recommendations and guidelines of the Carnegie Group's 2007 effort to "Reclaim the EdD" as well as to outline the work completed at the University of Virginia related to their re-design of the Doctor of Education (EdD) degree. In order to address the re-envision and re-formulation of the Doctor of Education degree, several topics were covered: (a) differentiation of the Doctor of Education and the Doctor of Philosophy degrees; (b) limitation, characteristics, and principles of the Doctor of Education program; (c) proposed course of study; (d) training experiences for the Doctor of Education program; (e) research and dissertation requirements for the Doctor of Education program; and (f) the influence of how this newly re-envisioned Doctor of Education program might impact on Kinesiology, especially in the areas of pedagogy and adapted physical education.

引用

页码：24 / 33

页数：10

共 22 条

[1]

[Anonymous], WORK PRINC PROF PRAC

[2]

Deering T.E., 1998, EDUC FORUM, V62, P243

[3]

Dill DD., 1985, REV HIGH EDUC, V8, P169

[4]

Duke D., 2009, CAPSTONE PROJECT STA

[5]

Evans Rodney., 2007, Educational Researcher, V36, P553, DOI [DOI 10.3102/0013189X07313149, 10.3102/0013189X07313149]

[6]

Hinchey P.H., 2008, ACTION RES PRIMER

[7]

Levine A., 2005, ED SCH LEADERS

[8]

Miller P., 2008, Report of the Committee on the Education Doctorate

[9]

Mills G.E., 2010, Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher, V4th

[10]

Murphy J., 2005, School Leadership Review, V1, P33

← 1 2 3 →