The Effects of Structures and Power on State Bargaining Strategies

被引:26
作者
McKibben, Heather Elko [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
ISSUE LINKAGES; NEGOTIATION; COOPERATION; LOGIC;
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00628.x
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
When and why will states adopt more (or less) cooperative bargaining strategies? Standard answers to this question focus on the role of state power. Other scholars highlight socialization effects. I argue that in most international negotiations, the institutional bargaining structure will mitigate the effects of power and socialization, and drive state bargaining behavior. Factors highlighted by formal models of international bargaining should therefore best explain the variation in the strategies states adopt. I introduce empirical measures of these abstract concepts, and test their effects against those of power and socialization using an original dataset of state bargaining strategies in the European Union (EU). The results show that structural factors best explain variation in the EU states' bargaining strategies. I conclude by highlighting the conditions under which these effects should explain state bargaining behavior in other international negotiations, and discuss the implications of this argument for the study of international bargaining.
引用
收藏
页码:411 / 427
页数:17
相关论文
共 56 条
[51]  
Waltz Kenneth N., 1979, Theory of International Politics.
[52]   The Council Presidency - Power broker or burden? An empirical analysis [J].
Warntjen, Andreas .
EUROPEAN UNION POLITICS, 2008, 9 (03) :315-338
[53]   COLLECTIVE IDENTITY FORMATION AND THE INTERNATIONAL STATE [J].
WENDT, A .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1994, 88 (02) :384-397
[54]   Generalized ordered logit/partial proportional odds models for ordinal dependent variables [J].
Williams, Richard .
STATA JOURNAL, 2006, 6 (01) :58-82
[55]  
Wriggins W., 1976, 50 SOLUTION, P208
[56]  
Zartman I.W., 1987, POSITIVE SUM IMPROVI