Purchasing power parity in transition countries: Old wine with new bottle

被引:2
|
作者
He, Huizhen [1 ,2 ]
Ranjbar, Omid [3 ]
Chang, Tsangyao [4 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Sch Econ, Chengtu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Financial Coll, Dept Investment & Insurance, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Minist Ind Mine & Trade, Dept Int Affairs, Tehran, Iran
[4] Feng Chia Univ, Dept Finance, Taichung 40724, Taiwan
关键词
Purchasing power parity; Transition countries; Sequential Panel Selection Method; Panel KSS test; Fourier function; REAL EXCHANGE-RATES; UNIT-ROOT TESTS; TIME-SERIES; GREAT CRASH; CENTURIES; PANEL-DATA; INTERVENTION; STATIONARITY; HYPOTHESIS; ECONOMIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.japwor.2013.06.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study questions whether the long-run purchasing power parity (PPP) holds in the transition economies (Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romanian, and Russia) for the period from January 1995 to October 2011. We employ the Sequential Panel Selection Method (SPSM) procedure using the Panel KSS unit root test with a Fourier function, a novel approach to panel unit root testing. The SPSM approach classifies the whole panel into a group of stationary and non-stationary series and is able to account for structural breaks, nonlinearity, and cross-section dependence. The results indicate that the PPP holds true for more than half of these transition countries studied, with the exception of Hungarian, the Czech Republic and the Russia. The findings have important policy implications for the transition countries. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 32
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Purchasing power parity in transition countries: Sequential panel selection method
    He, Huizhen
    Chang, Tsangyao
    ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2013, 35 : 604 - 609
  • [2] Purchasing power parity - nonlinear threshold unit root test for transition countries
    Liu, Siyue
    Zhang, Dongxiang
    Chang, Tsangyao
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2012, 19 (18) : 1781 - 1785
  • [3] Revisiting purchasing power parity for nine transition countries: a Fourier stationary test
    Lin, Su-Yuan
    Chang, Horng-Jinh
    Chang, Tsangyao
    POST-COMMUNIST ECONOMIES, 2011, 23 (02) : 191 - 201
  • [4] TESTING PURCHASING POWER PARITY IN TRANSITION COUNTRIES: EVIDENCE FROM STRUCTURAL BREAKS
    Acaravci, Ali
    Ozturk, Ilhan
    AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC, 2010, 12 (27) : 190 - 198
  • [5] PURCHASING POWER PARITY IN NINE TRANSITION COUNTRIES: PANEL SURKSS TEST
    Chang, Tsangyao
    Tzeng, Han-Wen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FINANCE & ECONOMICS, 2013, 18 (01) : 74 - 81
  • [6] Threshold effects in purchasing power parity for African Countries
    Liu, Yu-Shao
    Zhu, Meng-Nan
    Su, Chi-Wei
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, 2011, 5 (24): : 10235 - 10242
  • [7] Purchasing power parity in major OPEC countries: flexible Fourier stationary test
    Su, Chi-Wei
    Liu, Yu-Shao
    Zhu, Meng-Nan
    Lee, Kuei-Chiu
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2012, 19 (01) : 19 - 24
  • [8] THE VALIDITY OF PURCHASING POWER PARITY IN THE BRICS COUNTRIES
    Guris, Burak
    Tirasoglu, Muhammed
    PRAGUE ECONOMIC PAPERS, 2018, 27 (04): : 417 - 426
  • [9] Purchasing Power Parity for Transition Countries Further Evidence from Panel SURADF Test with a Fourier Function
    Chang, Tsangyao
    Lee, Chia-Hao
    Chou, Pei-I
    Wang, Shiou-Chih
    EASTERN EUROPEAN ECONOMICS, 2012, 50 (04) : 42 - 59
  • [10] Purchasing power parity with flexible Fourier stationary test for Central and Eastern European countries
    Chang, Hsu-Ling
    Liu, De-Chih
    Su, Chi-Wei
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2012, 44 (32) : 4249 - 4256