Sensibilism, Psychologism, and Kant's Debt to Hume

被引:7
作者
Chance, Brian A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1017/S1369415411000185
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
Hume's account of causation is often regarded a challenge Kant must overcome if the Critical philosophy is to be successful. But from Kant's time to the present, Hume's denial of our ability to cognize supersensible objects, a denial that relies heavily on his account of causation, has also been regarded as a forerunner to Kant's critique of metaphysics. After identifying reasons for rejecting Wayne Waxman's recent account of Kant's debt to Hume, I present my own, more modest account of this debt, an account that seeks to unite the two very different pictures of Kant's relationship to Hume sketched above.
引用
收藏
页码:325 / 349
页数:25
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Allison HenryE., 2004, Kant's Transcendental Idealism
[2]  
Anderson Lanier R., 2002, HIST PHILOS SCI NEW, V9, P67
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Critique of Pure Reason
[4]  
[Anonymous], I KANT LECT METAPHYS
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1996, I KANT PRACTICAL PHI
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1999, ESSAY HUMAN UNDERSTA
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2000, KANT FATE AUTONOMY
[8]  
Beck L. W., 1978, ESAAYS KANT HUME
[9]  
Beiser FrederickC., 1987, The Fate of Reason: German Philosophy from Kant to Fichte
[10]  
Berkeley George, 1975, Philosophical works, including the works on vision