Effective support for community resource management

被引:12
作者
Ansink, Erik [1 ]
Bouma, Jetske [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Inst Environm Studies, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Community resource management; Coalitions; Conservation; Stability; INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL AGREEMENTS; COMMON-PROPERTY RESOURCE; STABILITY; PAYMENTS; CONSERVATION; INEQUALITY; COALITIONS; FISHERIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.forpol.2013.01.007
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A popular alternative to state-led resource management is community resource management. This decentralised approach is potentially more efficient, but is not necessarily stable. We study this issue using coalition theory, arguing that some of the conditions for effective community resource management may induce the formation of a coalition of community members - rather than the community as a whole - that cooperate in resource management. We employ a classical model specification from the literature on international environmental agreements to analyse the stability of such coalitions. A novel observation that we make in this paper is that coalitions may be the target of intervention in order to boost community conservation effort. To analyse this possibility, we extend the model with a payment to the coalition, which can be interpreted as a payment for the provision of ecosystem services. Our results show that such payments can stabilise larger and otherwise unstable coalitions, and thereby increase community conservation effort. Moreover, we solve the selection problem of optimal payment by an external agent and we show how this optimal payment relates to the communities' opportunity costs of conservation. These results are relevant for the theoretical literature on coalition theory, the empirical literature on community resource management, and the policy debate on the potential impact of incentive mechanisms for community-based conservation. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:94 / 103
页数:10
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources [J].
Agrawal, A .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 29 (10) :1649-1672
[2]   A tale of two communities: Explaining deforestation in Mexico [J].
Alix-Garcia, J ;
De Janvry, A ;
Sadoulet, E .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2005, 33 (02) :219-235
[3]  
[Anonymous], JENA EC RES PAPERS
[4]   Wealth inequality and efficiency in the commons .1. The unregulated case [J].
Baland, JM ;
Platteau, JP .
OXFORD ECONOMIC PAPERS-NEW SERIES, 1997, 49 (04) :451-482
[5]   SELF-ENFORCING INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL AGREEMENTS [J].
BARRETT, S .
OXFORD ECONOMIC PAPERS-NEW SERIES, 1994, 46 :878-894
[6]   Consensus treaties [J].
Barrett, S .
JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL AND THEORETICAL ECONOMICS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR DIE GESAMTE STAATSWISSENSCHAFT, 2002, 158 (04) :529-547
[7]  
Barrett Scott., 2003, Environment Statecraft
[8]   Is small really beautiful? Community-based natural resource management in Malawi and Botswana [J].
Blaikie, Piers .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2006, 34 (11) :1942-1957
[9]  
BOUMA JA, 2008, CTR DISSERTATION SER, V207
[10]   Trust and cooperation: Social capital and community resource management [J].
Bouma, Jetske ;
Bulte, Erwin ;
van Soest, Daan .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2008, 56 (02) :155-166