Resisting Authoritarian Populism

被引:0
作者
Scheuerman, William E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Polit Sci, Bloomington, IN 46202 USA
关键词
authoritarianism; civil disobedience; civil resistance; nonviolence; populism; protest; uncivil disobedience; violence;
D O I
10.1163/25888072-BJA10029
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Authoritarian populism poses major challenges to democracy. Yet relatively little systematic political-theoretical or philosophical analysis has focused on how best to oppose or resist it. The present essay focuses on three possible approaches now being tentatively discussed. Some writers emphasize the possible virtues of civil disobedience, others are advocating a related yet broader strategy of civil resistance, and yet others abandon both "civil" approaches in favor of uncivil disobedience. Despite their many strengths, each approach suffers from weaknesses, in part because each responds incompletely to the challenges of authoritarian populism and its use of increasingly commonplace modes of "smart" repression. With ominous implications for those worried about democracy's fate, populists are embracing coercive techniques designed to squelch dissent without generating public sympathy or a popular backlash.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 20
页数:20
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Al Kadivar Mohammad, 2018, Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, V4, P3
[2]  
[Anonymous], CIV RES WHAT EV NEED, P114
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1988, BLACK RADICALISM CIV
[4]  
Chenoweth Erica, 2021, CIVIL RESISTANCE WHA, P3
[5]  
Chenoweth Erica, 2019, VIOLENCE IS DANGEROU
[6]  
Dahl Robert, 1998, On Democracy, P37
[7]  
Dapiron Anthony, 2020, CITY FIRE FIGHT HONG
[8]  
Delmas Candice, 2018, PHILOS COMPASS, V69, P685
[9]  
Delmas Candice, 2018, RAISONS POLITIQUE, V69
[10]  
Delmas Candice, 2020, Boston ReviewJanuary 13,